From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Randy Dunlap Subject: Re: [PATCH acs_ame scsi driver 000 of 1] Introduction Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 16:45:41 -0800 Message-ID: <20071211164541.a8043800.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> References: <87d84fba0712092003h3eb90344o89f9b0bc9c65fdb7@mail.gmail.com> <20071210165548.GC26334@parisc-linux.org> <20071211162408.54544ec3.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from rgminet01.oracle.com ([148.87.113.118]:41596 "EHLO rgminet01.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752142AbXLLAqQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Dec 2007 19:46:16 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20071211162408.54544ec3.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Andrew Morton Cc: Matthew Wilcox , recalljeffchang@gmail.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 16:24:08 -0800 Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 09:55:48 -0700 > Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 12:03:18PM +0800, chang jeff wrote: > > > Dear Sir, > > > > > > Following is patche for scsi driver in 2.6.23.9 what should get into > > > 2.6.23.9-final if possible. > > > > > > First refines a newly created scsi driver > > > (/[kernel-version]/driver/scsi/acs_ame). > > > > > > Thanks, > > > JeffChang. > > > > Hi Jeff, > > > > You don't seem to have attached the driver ... maybe you sent a second > > email that hasn't arrived yet? I see Andrew sent a mail (possibly to > > one of your colleagues?) that explains that he doesn't personally take > > scsi driver patches: http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/30/7 > > > > Well, I'll pass an eye over them and will queue them up for a bit or > review-and-test if it looks like they're being neglected. > > However I can't queue this one because a) it's wordwrapped and b) there are > patches in -mm which remove scsi_cmnd.request_buffer (and probably other > things). > > But that doesn't prevent scsi developers from performing code review. but .. but .. where is the patch? It was missing from the first mail in this thread. --- ~Randy