From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Wilcox Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi device recovery Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 06:39:27 -0700 Message-ID: <20071212133927.GI26334@parisc-linux.org> References: <200712121354.14474.bs@q-leap.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from palinux.external.hp.com ([192.25.206.14]:33459 "EHLO mail.parisc-linux.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751492AbXLLNj2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Dec 2007 08:39:28 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200712121354.14474.bs@q-leap.de> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Bernd Schubert Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 01:54:14PM +0100, Bernd Schubert wrote: > below is a patch introducing device recovery, trying to prevent i/o errors > when a DID_NO_CONNECT or SOFT_ERROR does happen. Why doesn't the regular scsi_eh do what you need? -- Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step."