From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pete Zaitcev Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/30] blk_end_request: changing ub (take 4) Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 11:49:38 -0800 Message-ID: <20071214114938.b87883af.zaitcev@redhat.com> References: <20071211154803.58beb681.zaitcev@redhat.com> <20071212.153815.39152138.k-ueda@ct.jp.nec.com> <20071213135916.27ebe3f9.zaitcev@redhat.com> <20071214.120454.39153297.k-ueda@ct.jp.nec.com> Reply-To: device-mapper development Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20071214.120454.39153297.k-ueda@ct.jp.nec.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com To: Kiyoshi Ueda Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com, zaitcev@redhat.com, jens.axboe@oracle.com List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 12:04:54 -0500 (EST), Kiyoshi Ueda wrote: > I have investigated all code paths which call ub_end_rq() in ub.c, > and confirmed that ub_end_rq() is always called with the queue lock > held. (sc->lock is registered as a queue lock.) Thanks for reminding me about blk_init_queue, I forgot. Sorry for the confusion. Greetings, -- Pete