From: FUJITA Tomonori <tomof@acm.org>
To: matthew@wil.cx
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, kristen.c.accardi@intel.com,
fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp
Subject: Re: SCSI RAM driver
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 22:14:53 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080219221442L.tomof@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080218063658.GF21012@parisc-linux.org>
On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 23:36:59 -0700
Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx> wrote:
>
> This is the first release of a driver we've been using internally at Intel
> for a few weeks which is as low-latency as possible. It's designed to
> let us find latency issues elsewhere in the storage stack (eg filesystem,
> block layer, scsi layer)
>
> There are a few different options, controlled through module parameters.
> The sector size and disc capacity are load-time parameters, but the
> parameters affecting performance are tweakable at runtime.
>
> Arguably, this driver should be merged into scsi_debug. I didn't want to
> trip over Doug's toes while developing this driver, and the two drivers
> do have very different objectives. scsi_debug is obviously a lot more
> fully-featured and implements lots of bits of the spec I simply haven't
> bothered with. Like MODE SENSE ;-)
I see that two drivers have very different objectives but if we add
use_thread option to scsi_debug (we can do easily), it seems that
scsi_debug can provide all the features that scsi_ram does.
If we clean up scsi_debug driver, can scsi_debug work as a nice scsi
ram driver?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-19 13:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-18 6:36 SCSI RAM driver Matthew Wilcox
2008-02-19 13:14 ` FUJITA Tomonori [this message]
2008-02-19 13:31 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-02-19 13:46 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-03-02 10:59 ` FUJITA Tomonori
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080219221442L.tomof@acm.org \
--to=tomof@acm.org \
--cc=fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=kristen.c.accardi@intel.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).