From: Chandra Seetharaman <sekharan@us.ibm.com>
To: dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: andmike@us.ibm.com, michaelc@cs.wisc.edu,
Chandra Seetharaman <sekharan@us.ibm.com>,
James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com, jens.axboe@oracle.com,
agk@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH 0/7] Move hardware handlers from dm layer to SCSI layer
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 17:08:28 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080228010828.5535.74088.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
Hello,
Set of patches that follow this email facilitate movement of hardware
handlers from dm layer to SCSI layer.
Previous set of patches that implemented this was posted on Jan 24:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=120113462706925&w=2
Changes have been made based on feedback received from James, Alasdair,
Mike Christie and Mike Anderson.
Following are the changes:
- Removed scsi_dh hardware handler in the dm layer. This means
no change (not even a change in the multipath.conf file) is
required in user space.
- Replaced REQ_OP_LB_TRANSITION with an activate() function.
- Removed the SDEV_PASSIVE and added a prep_fn to the device
handler, hence giving it the veto power.
- Replaced blk_execute_rq_nowait() with blk_execute_rq() in
device handlers to make them synchronous. Added a thread(work queue)
to dm-multipath to handle requests asynchronously.
- Added Ed's changes to the EMC hardware handler.
Patches are created on top of 2.6.25-rc2-mm1.
Testing has been done with a IBM DS4800 storage device, which means the
infrastructure and the lsi_rdac hardware handler has been tested. Testing
by someone with the EMC hardware and/or HP hardware would be appreciated.
Comments, suggestions solicited.
Thanks,
chandra
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Chandra Seetharaman | Be careful what you choose....
- sekharan@us.ibm.com | .......you may get it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
next reply other threads:[~2008-02-28 1:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-28 1:08 Chandra Seetharaman [this message]
2008-02-28 1:08 ` [PATCH 1/7] scsi_dh: add skeleton for SCSI Device Handlers Chandra Seetharaman
2008-03-04 21:37 ` James Bottomley
2008-03-04 22:25 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2008-02-28 1:08 ` [PATCH 2/7] scsi_dh: add lsi rdac device handler Chandra Seetharaman
2008-02-28 1:08 ` [PATCH 3/7] scsi_dh: add hp sw " Chandra Seetharaman
2008-02-28 1:08 ` [PATCH 4/7] scsi_dh: add EMC Clariion " Chandra Seetharaman
2008-02-28 1:08 ` [PATCH 5/7] scsi_dh: Use SCSI device handler in dm-multipath Chandra Seetharaman
2008-02-28 1:09 ` [PATCH 6/7] scsi_dh: Remove hardware handlers from dm Chandra Seetharaman
2008-02-28 1:09 ` [PATCH 7/7] scsi_dh: Remove hardware handler infrastructure " Chandra Seetharaman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080228010828.5535.74088.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain \
--to=sekharan@us.ibm.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=andmike@us.ibm.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michaelc@cs.wisc.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox