From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christof Schmitt Subject: Re: [patch 0/2] zfcp fixes Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:26:43 +0100 Message-ID: <20080310162642.GA18110@schmichrtp.de.ibm.com> References: <20080310151852.808020000@de.ibm.com> <1205163204.2941.10.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mtagate6.uk.ibm.com ([195.212.29.139]:37652 "EHLO mtagate6.uk.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751206AbYCJQ0r (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:26:47 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1205163204.2941.10.camel@localhost.localdomain> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: James Bottomley Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 10:33:24AM -0500, James Bottomley wrote: > scsi-misc is accumulating paches for the next merge window. If these > are fixes as they seem to be, shouldn't they be going into > scsi-rc-fixes, which is where bug fixes are accumulated for fast onward > transmission? These fixes are not critical. The one for the ERP thread was found during code cleanup, and i am not sure if it is possible to trigger the bug. The other one improves the error recovery behaviour, so that in this special case there are less actions necessary. In short: They fit scsi-misc better than the important fixes in scsi-rc. When there are critical zfcp fixes, i will send them for scsi-rc. Christof