From: Chandra Seetharaman <sekharan@us.ibm.com>
To: dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: andmike@us.ibm.com, michaelc@cs.wisc.edu,
James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com, jens.axboe@oracle.com,
agk@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH 0/7] scsi_dh: Move hardware handlers from dm to SCSI
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 18:33:28 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080311013328.23179.76692.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
Hello,
Set of patches that follow this email facilitate movement of hardware
handlers from dm layer to SCSI layer.
Previous set of patches that implemented this was posted on Feb 27:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=120416126328081&w=2
Changes have been made based on feedback received from James and Mike
Anderson.
Following are the changes:
- Reduced the number of pointers used in scsi_device data structure
from 2 to 1.
- Added a special return code for check_sense function to return when
the sense code is not handled by hardware handler's check_sense fucntion.
- Added a request pointer argument to hardware handler's prep_fn.
Patches are created on top of 2.6.25-rc2-mm1.
Testing has been done with a IBM DS4800 storage device, which means the
infrastructure and the lsi_rdac hardware handler has been tested. Testing
by someone with the EMC hardware and/or HP hardware would be appreciated.
Comments, suggestions solicited.
Thanks,
chandra
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Chandra Seetharaman | Be careful what you choose....
- sekharan@us.ibm.com | .......you may get it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
next reply other threads:[~2008-03-11 1:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-11 1:33 Chandra Seetharaman [this message]
2008-03-11 1:33 ` [PATCH 1/7] scsi_dh: add skeleton for SCSI Device Handlers Chandra Seetharaman
2008-03-11 1:33 ` [PATCH 2/7] scsi_dh: add lsi rdac device handler Chandra Seetharaman
2008-03-11 1:33 ` [PATCH 3/7] scsi_dh: add hp sw " Chandra Seetharaman
2008-03-11 1:33 ` [PATCH 4/7] scsi_dh: add EMC Clariion " Chandra Seetharaman
2008-03-11 1:34 ` [PATCH 5/7] scsi_dh: Use SCSI device handler in dm-multipath Chandra Seetharaman
2008-03-11 1:34 ` [PATCH 6/7] scsi_dh: Remove hardware handlers from dm Chandra Seetharaman
2008-03-11 1:34 ` [PATCH 7/7] scsi_dh: Remove hardware handler infrastructure " Chandra Seetharaman
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-04-01 22:51 [PATCH 0/7] scsi_dh: Move hardware handlers from dm to SCSI Chandra Seetharaman
2008-04-16 1:18 Chandra Seetharaman
2008-04-17 21:18 Chandra Seetharaman
2008-04-17 22:22 Chandra Seetharaman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080311013328.23179.76692.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain \
--to=sekharan@us.ibm.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=andmike@us.ibm.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michaelc@cs.wisc.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).