From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alan Cox Subject: Re: [PATCH] a100u2w: fix bitmap lookup routine Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 12:34:37 -0400 Message-ID: <20080320163437.GA21498@devserv.devel.redhat.com> References: <20080317123200.GA17756@APFDCB5C> <1205765204.6767.129.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20080319142419.GA27779@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <20080320135518W.tomof@acm.org> <20080320093448.GA30888@APFDCB5C> <20080320141242.GA14790@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <1206022642.3038.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:38090 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753413AbYCTQex (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Mar 2008 12:34:53 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1206022642.3038.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: James Bottomley Cc: Alan Cox , Akinobu Mita , FUJITA Tomonori , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, hch@lst.de, dledford@redhat.com, fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 09:17:22AM -0500, James Bottomley wrote: > Actually, could you just verify the original patch from Akinobu Mita? > That's the -rc-fixes candidate. We can worry about doing bitmaps better > later since it will be for the merge window. I'll regenerate it against > the tree for you when I get the first one merged. Seems to work with the basic testing I can do