From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org Subject: [Bug 6280] new line of Xyratex RAID products and a patch to update for 2.4.x non-sequential LUN mapping Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 09:53:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20080320165318.6672C11D10A@picon.linux-foundation.org> References: Return-path: Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:37307 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754336AbYCTQxh (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Mar 2008 12:53:37 -0400 Received: from picon.linux-foundation.org (picon.linux-foundation.org [140.211.169.79]) by smtp1.linux-foundation.org (8.14.2/8.13.5/Debian-3ubuntu1.1) with ESMTP id m2KGrIv6032751 for ; Thu, 20 Mar 2008 09:53:19 -0700 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6280 ------- Comment #4 from pkoutoupis@sbcglobal.net 2008-03-20 09:53 ------- Well, our SCSI level reports 3. But this patch was specific to allow non-contiguous LUN mappings for our vendor/model array products on the 2.4.x kernel only. This is never a problem on 2.6. Seeing how we discontinued support for the 2.4.x and that includes our older products that were qualified for it, I do not see the need to press on with this patch. The bug can be closed. Thank you all for your assistance. Regards, Petros Koutoupis bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6280 ------- Comment #3 from anonymous@kernel-bugs.osdl.org 2008-03-20 06:52 ------- Reply-To: James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com On Thu, 2008-03-20 at 00:34 -0700, bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote: > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6280 > > > protasnb@gmail.com changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > CC| |protasnb@gmail.com > AssignedTo|scsi_drivers-other@kernel- |linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org > |bugs.osdl.org | > > > > > ------- Comment #2 from protasnb@gmail.com 2008-03-20 00:34 ------- > Petros, > This bugzilla is about 2.6.XX. Do you think your patch makes sense for latest > kernels, or this support is already implemented there? Depends what SCSI level the array reports. If > 2 then the REPORT_LUNS scan will already have taken care of all of this. James Well, our SCSI level reports 3. But this patch was specific to allow non-contiguous LUN mappings for our vendor/model array products on the 2.4.x kernel only. This is never a problem on 2.6.

Seeing how we discontinued support for the 2.4.x and that includes our older products that were qualified for it, I do not see the need to press on with this patch.

The bug can be closed. Thank you all for your assistance.

Regards,

Petros Koutoupis

bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6280





------- Comment #3 from anonymous@kernel-bugs.osdl.org 2008-03-20 06:52 -------
Reply-To: James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com

On Thu, 2008-03-20 at 00:34 -0700, bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org
wrote:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6280
>
>
> protasnb@gmail.com changed:
>
> What |Removed |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> CC| |protasnb@gmail.com
> AssignedTo|scsi_drivers-other@kernel- |linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
> |bugs.osdl.org |
>
>
>
>
> ------- Comment #2 from protasnb@gmail.com 2008-03-20 00:34 -------
> Petros,
> This bugzilla is about 2.6.XX. Do you think your patch makes sense for latest
> kernels, or this support is already implemented there?

Depends what SCSI level the array reports. If > 2 then the REPORT_LUNS
scan will already have taken care of all of this.

James


--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.

-- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.