public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: Eric Piel <eric.piel@tremplin-utc.net>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Tilman Schmidt <tilman@imap.cc>,
	Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>
Subject: Re: What should be done with wrong warning "please use bus_type methods." on sd, sr, st and osst?
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2008 10:59:22 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080324175922.GB13816@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1206372247.3494.22.camel@localhost.localdomain>

On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 10:24:07AM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 2008-03-24 at 15:00 +0100, Eric Piel wrote:
> > Since commit 751bf4d7865e4ced406be93b04c7436d866d3684 (scsi_sysfs: 
> > restore prep_fn when ULD is removed), the warning "Driver '%s' needs 
> > updating - please use bus_type methods." is generated for several scsi 
> > drivers (sr, sg, st and osst). It does so because it thinks that the 
> > driver remove() functions will not be called (cf 
> > __device_release_driver()). Actually, they are called by scsi_bus_remove().
> > 
> > This has been noted already a couple of times [1] [2] [3], but it seems 
> > absolutely nothing conclusive came out of the reports.
> > 
> > What should be done? Delete the warning? Change it so it doesn't get 
> > triggered if drv->bus->remove == scsi_bus_remove? Merge 
> > scsi_bus_remove() into the driver remove() functions? Disregard the 
> > monthly warming reports?
> 
> At least for SCSI, the warning is wrong .. the drivers are properly
> converted.  The issue that triggers the warning is that we use the
> bus_type power management methods to receive the notifies in the
> mid-layer (where we do mid-layer specific stuff) then we notify the
> drivers through the driver power management methods.
> 
> A solution would be to duplicate the power management methods in the
> scsi_driver structure, but this is a complete waste of space since the
> generic driver ones aren't going away (at least according to Kay and
> Greg).  I still think the best thing to do is just to turn off this
> spurious warning.

Do you have a patch that can detect the usage that you currently have so
that I can change the warning message to not trigger if things are set
up that way instead?

thanks,

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2008-03-24 17:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-03-24 14:00 What should be done with wrong warning "please use bus_type methods." on sd, sr, st and osst? Eric Piel
2008-03-24 15:24 ` James Bottomley
2008-03-24 17:59   ` Greg KH [this message]
2008-03-24 18:16     ` James Bottomley
2008-03-25 22:20       ` Éric Piel
2008-03-25 22:34         ` James Bottomley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080324175922.GB13816@kroah.com \
    --to=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --cc=eric.piel@tremplin-utc.net \
    --cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=tilman@imap.cc \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox