From: Chandra Seetharaman <sekharan@us.ibm.com>
To: dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: andmike@us.ibm.com, michaelc@cs.wisc.edu, asson_ronald@emc.com,
James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com, Benoit_Arthur@emc.com,
jens.axboe@oracle.com, agk@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH 0/7] scsi_dh: Move hardware handlers from dm to SCSI
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2008 15:51:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080401225133.2124.62025.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
Hello,
Set of patches that follow this email facilitate movement of hardware
handlers from dm layer to SCSI layer.
Previous set of patches that implemented this was posted on Mar 10:
http://marc.info/?l=dm-devel&m=120519925915390&w=2
Changes have been made based on (1)test results from Dave and
(2)discussions with Jens and James:
- Make sure scsi_dh compiles as a modules when scsi is compiled as a
module.
- Set REQ_QUIET flag in the request in rdac hardware handler's prep_fn,
if the path is the passive path (to reduce the extraneous error
messages).
Patches are created on top of 2.6.25-rc5-mm1.
Testing has been done with the following storage devices:
- IBM DS4800 storage device for the lsi_rdac hardware handler
- HP storage device for the hp_sw hardware handler.
Thanks to Dave(dwysocha@redhat.com)
- EMC storage device for the EMC hardware handler.
Thanks to Arthur(Benoit_Arthur@emc.com) and Ronald(asson_ronald@emc.com)
In effect all hardware handlers are tested.
Thanks,
chandra
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Chandra Seetharaman | Be careful what you choose....
- sekharan@us.ibm.com | .......you may get it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
next reply other threads:[~2008-04-01 22:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-01 22:51 Chandra Seetharaman [this message]
2008-04-01 22:51 ` [PATCH 1/7] scsi_dh: add skeleton for SCSI Device Handlers Chandra Seetharaman
2008-04-01 22:51 ` [PATCH 2/7] scsi_dh: add lsi rdac device handler Chandra Seetharaman
2008-04-01 22:51 ` [PATCH 3/7] scsi_dh: add hp sw " Chandra Seetharaman
2008-04-01 22:51 ` [PATCH 4/7] scsi_dh: add EMC Clariion " Chandra Seetharaman
2008-04-01 22:52 ` [PATCH 5/7] scsi_dh: Use SCSI device handler in dm-multipath Chandra Seetharaman
2008-04-01 22:52 ` [PATCH 6/7] scsi_dh: Remove hardware handlers from dm Chandra Seetharaman
2008-04-01 22:52 ` [PATCH 7/7] scsi_dh: Remove hardware handler infrastructure " Chandra Seetharaman
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-04-17 22:22 [PATCH 0/7] scsi_dh: Move hardware handlers from dm to SCSI Chandra Seetharaman
2008-04-17 21:18 Chandra Seetharaman
2008-04-16 1:18 Chandra Seetharaman
2008-03-11 1:33 Chandra Seetharaman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080401225133.2124.62025.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain \
--to=sekharan@us.ibm.com \
--cc=Benoit_Arthur@emc.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=andmike@us.ibm.com \
--cc=asson_ronald@emc.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michaelc@cs.wisc.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).