public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wakko Warner <wakko@animx.eu.org>
To: "Moore, Eric" <Eric.Moore@lsi.com>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
	Richard Scobie <richard@sauce.co.nz>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: mptsas problem
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 17:34:20 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080414213420.GA13594@animx.eu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0631C836DBF79F42B5A60C8C8D4E8229FBE34D@NAMAIL2.ad.lsil.com>

Moore, Eric wrote:
> On Sunday, April 13, 2008 2:49 PM, Wakko Warner wrote:
> > > depth of 64 it may be queueing internally as well.  You could try
> > > lowering the lsi queue to 31 and seeing if it makes a difference.
> > 
> > IIRC, someone said the LSIs does queue in firmware.
> 
> It was probably me that told you that.   Anyways,  the lsiutil 100
> output you sent me last week indicated youre controller has NCQ
> disabled.     You need new firmware and controller chip rev in order to
> support NCQ.  You should contact LSI support to obtain which versions of
> firmware and chip rev that is required.   Meanwhile your controller will
> queuing commands for SATA, only sending one command across the wire at a
> time.   For SAS, you will not have this issue.

Does "chip rev" mean software/firmware or an actual chip?  Is there anyway
the driver can see this and set the queue_depth to 1?

-- 
 Lab tests show that use of micro$oft causes cancer in lab animals
 Got Gas???

  reply	other threads:[~2008-04-14 21:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-04-06 23:40 mptsas problem Richard Scobie
2008-04-07  1:04 ` Wakko Warner
2008-04-13 13:00   ` Douglas Gilbert
2008-04-13 14:39     ` James Bottomley
2008-04-13 14:31   ` James Bottomley
2008-04-13 16:48     ` Wakko Warner
2008-04-13 16:58       ` James Bottomley
2008-04-13 17:06         ` Wakko Warner
2008-04-13 17:37           ` James Bottomley
2008-04-13 20:49             ` Wakko Warner
2008-04-14 18:16               ` Moore, Eric
2008-04-14 21:34                 ` Wakko Warner [this message]
2008-04-15 17:26                   ` Moore, Eric
2008-04-15 22:49                     ` Wakko Warner
2008-04-13 22:22             ` Douglas Gilbert
2008-04-13 23:51               ` James Bottomley
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-04-06 19:56 Wakko Warner
     [not found] ` <0631C836DBF79F42B5A60C8C8D4E8229F64FC1@NAMAIL2.ad.lsil.com>
2008-04-07  1:07   ` Wakko Warner
2008-04-07 11:36     ` Bernd Schubert
2008-04-07 15:16     ` Moore, Eric
2008-04-07 16:54       ` Wakko Warner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080414213420.GA13594@animx.eu.org \
    --to=wakko@animx.eu.org \
    --cc=Eric.Moore@lsi.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=richard@sauce.co.nz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox