From: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
To: James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com, dm-devel@redhat.com
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, bzolnier@gmail.com,
jens.axboe@oracle.com, fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, bharrosh@panasas.com, agk@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] block: no need to initialize rq->cmd with blk_get_request
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 03:35:11 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080426033504U.tomof@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1209142784.3087.25.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On Fri, 25 Apr 2008 11:59:44 -0500
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-04-26 at 01:54 +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > On Fri, 25 Apr 2008 11:45:01 -0500
> > James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, 2008-04-26 at 01:23 +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > > > blk_get_request initializes rq->cmd (rq_init does) so the users don't
> > > > need to do that.
> > > >
> > > > The purpose of this patch is to remove sizeof(rq->cmd) and &rq->cmd,
> > > > as a preparation for large command support, which changes rq->cmd from
> > > > the static array to a pointer. sizeof(rq->cmd) will not make sense and
> > > > &rq->cmd won't work.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
> > > > Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
> > > > Cc: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
> > > > Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > block/scsi_ioctl.c | 3 ---
> > > > drivers/block/pktcdvd.c | 2 --
> > > > drivers/cdrom/cdrom.c | 1 -
> > >
> > > These:
> > >
> > > > drivers/md/dm-emc.c | 2 --
> > > > drivers/md/dm-mpath-hp-sw.c | 1 -
> > > > drivers/md/dm-mpath-rdac.c | 1 -
> > >
> > > Conflict with this set of patches:
> > >
> > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/jejb/scsi-pending-2.6.git;a=summary
> > >
> > > Which move the dm pieces to being request based. The patch series
> > > hasn't had an ACK yet from Alasdair, but it would be nice if you could
> > > look it over and see if it needs the memsets pulling out.
> >
> > Seems that it needs the memsets pulling out. For example,
> >
> > [PATCH 2/7] scsi_dh: add lsi rdac device handler has:
> >
> > + memset(&rq->cmd, 0, BLK_MAX_CDB);
> >
> >
> > Do you want a patch against scsi-pending?
>
> Yes please ...
You can apply this for scsi-pending now.
scsi_dh will not be merge for 2.6.26, the original patch needs to be
merged. If scsi_dh will, then we can drop the original patch since we
can live without the changes to scsi_ioctl.c, pktcdvd.c, and cdrom.c
(sizeof(rq->cmd) doesn't make sense but it doesn't hurt us).
==
From: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Subject: [PATCH] scsi_dh: no need to initialize rq->cmd with blk_get_request
blk_get_request initializes rq->cmd (rq_init does) so the users don't
need to do that.
The purpose of this patch is to remove &rq->cmd, as a preparation for
large command support, which changes rq->cmd from the static array to
a pointer. &rq->cmd won't work.
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Cc: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
---
drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_emc.c | 1 -
drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_hp_sw.c | 1 -
drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_rdac.c | 1 -
3 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_emc.c b/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_emc.c
index 71d20c8..df7992c 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_emc.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_emc.c
@@ -258,7 +258,6 @@ static struct request *get_req(struct scsi_device *sdev, int cmd)
return NULL;
}
- memset(&rq->cmd, 0, BLK_MAX_CDB);
rq->cmd[0] = cmd;
rq->cmd_len = COMMAND_SIZE(rq->cmd[0]);
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_hp_sw.c b/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_hp_sw.c
index d1b66c3..7abea59 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_hp_sw.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_hp_sw.c
@@ -91,7 +91,6 @@ static int hp_sw_activate(struct scsi_device *sdev)
req->cmd_type = REQ_TYPE_BLOCK_PC;
req->cmd_flags |= REQ_FAILFAST;
req->cmd_len = COMMAND_SIZE(START_STOP);
- memset(req->cmd, 0, MAX_COMMAND_SIZE);
req->cmd[0] = START_STOP;
req->cmd[4] = 1; /* Start spin cycle */
req->timeout = HP_SW_TIMEOUT;
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_rdac.c b/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_rdac.c
index 1bf9cf8..3af8fa9 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_rdac.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_rdac.c
@@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ static struct request *get_rdac_req(struct scsi_device *sdev,
return NULL;
}
- memset(&rq->cmd, 0, BLK_MAX_CDB);
rq->sense = h->sense;
memset(rq->sense, 0, SCSI_SENSE_BUFFERSIZE);
rq->sense_len = 0;
--
1.5.4.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-25 18:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-25 16:23 [PATCH 0/6] add large command support to the block layer FUJITA Tomonori
2008-04-25 16:40 ` [PATCH 1/6] block: no need to initialize rq->cmd in prepare_flush_fn hook FUJITA Tomonori
2008-04-25 16:23 ` [PATCH 2/6] block: no need to initialize rq->cmd with blk_get_request FUJITA Tomonori
2008-04-25 16:23 ` [PATCH 3/6] block: rename and export rq_init() FUJITA Tomonori
2008-04-25 16:23 ` [PATCH 4/6] block: use blk_rq_init() to initialize the request FUJITA Tomonori
2008-04-25 16:23 ` [PATCH 5/6] ide: " FUJITA Tomonori
2008-04-25 16:23 ` [PATCH 6/6] block: add large command support FUJITA Tomonori
2008-04-27 11:43 ` Boaz Harrosh
2008-04-27 11:42 ` [PATCH 5/6] ide: use blk_rq_init() to initialize the request Boaz Harrosh
2008-04-27 11:41 ` [PATCH 4/6] block: " Boaz Harrosh
2008-04-27 11:41 ` [PATCH 3/6] block: rename and export rq_init() Boaz Harrosh
2008-04-25 16:45 ` [dm-devel] [PATCH 2/6] block: no need to initialize rq->cmd with blk_get_request James Bottomley
2008-04-25 16:54 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-04-25 16:59 ` James Bottomley
2008-04-25 18:35 ` FUJITA Tomonori [this message]
2008-04-29 7:54 ` [PATCH 0/6] add large command support to the block layer Jens Axboe
2008-04-29 11:55 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-04-29 12:32 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-04-29 12:37 ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-29 12:45 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-04-29 12:46 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080426033504U.tomof@acm.org \
--to=fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=bharrosh@panasas.com \
--cc=bzolnier@gmail.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).