From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Wilcox Subject: Re: [GIT PATCH] SCSI updates for 2.6.25 Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:01:13 -0600 Message-ID: <20080428210112.GC14990@parisc-linux.org> References: <1208540517.3063.18.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20080419151934.GA17089@elte.hu> <1208620484.3280.23.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20080419170530.GD1595@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> <1208626496.3280.40.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20080419204511.GP20637@parisc-linux.org> <20080428210034.GE18248@uranus.ravnborg.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080428210034.GE18248@uranus.ravnborg.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Sam Ravnborg Cc: Linus Torvalds , James Bottomley , Adrian Bunk , Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton , linux-scsi , linux-kernel , Greg KH List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 11:00:34PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 02:45:11PM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 01:14:23PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > So people: stop this total *idiocy* with "select is bad". It's not. The > > > lack of select is *much* worse. > > > > Could we consider applying this patch then? > > I applied the following. Reads much better. Thanks! -- Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step."