From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.25.1] Add scsi_execute_async_fifo() Date: Fri, 2 May 2008 11:55:25 -0400 Message-ID: <20080502155525.GA16353@infradead.org> References: <200805021638.42972.bart.vanassche@gmail.com> <20080502153306.GB7376@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:32959 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964909AbYEBPz2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 May 2008 11:55:28 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Bart Van Assche Cc: Christoph Hellwig , James Bottomley , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Vladislav Bolkhovitin , scst-devel@lists.sourceforge.net On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 05:53:22PM +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote: > Regarding out-of-tree modules: this is just a preparatory step before > submitting SCST for inclusion in the mainstream kernel. And what crackpipe did you smoke to thing we'd put duplicated target framework in? > Regarding scsi_execute_async(): I didn't know that this API is on its > way out. What will it be replaced by, and when ? blk_execute_rq/blk_execute_rq_nowait plus the block level helpers built ontop to build requests. > > Bart. ---end quoted text---