From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Wilcox Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.25.1] Add scsi_execute_async_fifo() Date: Fri, 2 May 2008 10:49:06 -0600 Message-ID: <20080502164905.GH14976@parisc-linux.org> References: <200805021638.42972.bart.vanassche@gmail.com> <20080502153306.GB7376@infradead.org> <20080502155525.GA16353@infradead.org> <20080502161629.GF14976@parisc-linux.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from palinux.external.hp.com ([192.25.206.14]:39364 "EHLO mail.parisc-linux.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758797AbYEBQtH (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 May 2008 12:49:07 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Bart Van Assche Cc: Christoph Hellwig , James Bottomley , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Vladislav Bolkhovitin , scst-devel@lists.sourceforge.net On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 06:23:08PM +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote: > Which target code is already in the mainline kernel, and who are the > maintainers for this code ? I checked the MAINTAINERS file in the > 2.6.25 tarball, but in this file I could not find the information I > was looking for. Can you really not locate drivers/scsi/scsi_tgt_lib.c in the tree? I appreciate that there's a lot of files in the drivers/scsi/ directory, but c'mon. I had no idea what it was called and it took about 30 seconds to find them once I realised you wanted all the work to be done for you. -- Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step."