From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Wilcox Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.25.1] Add scsi_execute_async_fifo() Date: Fri, 2 May 2008 11:02:44 -0600 Message-ID: <20080502170244.GI14976@parisc-linux.org> References: <200805021638.42972.bart.vanassche@gmail.com> <20080502153306.GB7376@infradead.org> <20080502155525.GA16353@infradead.org> <20080502161629.GF14976@parisc-linux.org> <20080502164905.GH14976@parisc-linux.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from palinux.external.hp.com ([192.25.206.14]:45007 "EHLO mail.parisc-linux.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751538AbYEBRCq (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 May 2008 13:02:46 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Bart Van Assche Cc: Christoph Hellwig , James Bottomley , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Vladislav Bolkhovitin , scst-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Mike Christie , FUJITA Tomonori On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 06:57:10PM +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote: > Thanks for looking this up. Would it be an acceptable approach if the > SCST code is modified such that it calls the code inside > drivers/scsi/scsi_tgt_lib.c whenever this is appropriate ? You need to talk to Mike and Tomo. >>From my point of view, the most important bit is the target layer <-> driver API. ie the transfer_response() method in the host template. I'm sure other people have their own preferences though. -- Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step."