From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jens Axboe Subject: Re: [DO NOT APPLY] sd take advantage of rotation speed Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 20:12:17 +0200 Message-ID: <20080625181216.GH20851@kernel.dk> References: <20080619160342.GJ4392@parisc-linux.org> <20080625134705.GZ20851@kernel.dk> <4862552A.5010900@gmail.com> <48627184.9010609@panasas.com> <20080625165759.GC20851@kernel.dk> <20080625172015.GR4392@parisc-linux.org> <20080625172638.GE20851@kernel.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from brick.kernel.dk ([87.55.233.238]:17368 "EHLO kernel.dk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751631AbYFYSMT (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jun 2008 14:12:19 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: "Martin K. Petersen" Cc: Matthew Wilcox , Boaz Harrosh , Ric Wheeler , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 25 2008, Martin K. Petersen wrote: > >>>>> "Jens" == Jens Axboe writes: > > Jens> Uhm, but it IS "a blatant layering violation", it's doing things > Jens> from the wrong side up :-) > > I also disagree with mucking with the elevator directly in sd.c. > > The whole point of my I/O hints work is to expose the I/O topology in > a generic fashion so that upper layers can take advantage of them. > > I'll post a new batch of those patches shortly... Good, that sounds useful! Sounds a lot like what I referred to as 'device profiles'. -- Jens Axboe