From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [build fix] Re: [GIT PATCH] SCSI part 1 Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 16:46:02 +0200 Message-ID: <20080716144602.GB4369@elte.hu> References: <1216138543.3312.60.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20080716101634.GA8494@elte.hu> <20080716103337.GA22931@elte.hu> <20080716131543.GA3673@elte.hu> <1216216320.3230.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20080716141805.GB22631@elte.hu> <20080716144106.GD25255@parisc-linux.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:49735 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759893AbYGPOqN (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jul 2008 10:46:13 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080716144106.GD25255@parisc-linux.org> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: James Bottomley , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , linux-scsi , linux-kernel * Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 04:18:05PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > btw., about the technical aspects of the solution, i'm not sure i like > > these big #ifdef blocks: > > It's partly the nature of the beast. There's already several large > #ifdef blocks in compat_ioctl.c -- CONFIG_NET, CONFIG_VT, > #CONFIG_SPARC, etc. I think what would help is a bit more grouping so > #individual blocks get bigger. yeah, that's OK - but why is scsi.h #ifdef-ed? For example we can include blkdev.h without #ifdef CONFIG_BLOCK. Ingo