From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: fix q->max_segment_size checking in blk_recalc_rq_segments about VMERGE Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 00:28:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20080719.002826.73806419.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20080717131444K.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> <20080717221908D.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:46196 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751299AbYGSH21 (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Jul 2008 03:28:27 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20080717221908D.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp Cc: mpatocka@redhat.com, jens.axboe@oracle.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org From: FUJITA Tomonori Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 22:18:44 +0900 > BTW, as I've already said, I'm not against removing the vmerge > accounting from the block layer. I am also, as stated, not against this. Fujita-san, please proposage a patch so that we can put this issue behind us :-)