public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: HighPoint Linux Team <linux@highpoint-tech.com>
Cc: James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	stable@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][SCSI] hptiop: add more PCI device IDs
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 00:34:19 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080729003419.1b754608.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200807251329.24263.linux@highpoint-tech.com>

On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 13:29:24 +0800 HighPoint Linux Team <linux@highpoint-tech.com> wrote:

> Add PCI device ID for new adapter models.
> 
> Signed-off-by: HighPoint Linux Team <linux@highpoint-tech.com>
> ---
> 
>  drivers/scsi/hptiop.c |    7 +++++++
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> 
> diff -purN linux-2.6.26-rc8/drivers/scsi/hptiop.c linux-2.6.26-rc8-hpt/drivers/scsi/hptiop.c
> --- linux-2.6.26-rc8/drivers/scsi/hptiop.c	2008-06-25 09:58:20.000000000 +0800
> +++ linux-2.6.26-rc8-hpt/drivers/scsi/hptiop.c	2008-07-24 15:09:50.000000000 +0800
> @@ -1249,6 +1249,13 @@ static struct pci_device_id hptiop_id_ta
>  	{ PCI_VDEVICE(TTI, 0x3522), (kernel_ulong_t)&hptiop_itl_ops },
>  	{ PCI_VDEVICE(TTI, 0x3410), (kernel_ulong_t)&hptiop_itl_ops },
>  	{ PCI_VDEVICE(TTI, 0x3540), (kernel_ulong_t)&hptiop_itl_ops },
> +	{ PCI_VDEVICE(TTI, 0x3530), (kernel_ulong_t)&hptiop_itl_ops },
> +	{ PCI_VDEVICE(TTI, 0x3560), (kernel_ulong_t)&hptiop_itl_ops },
> +	{ PCI_VDEVICE(TTI, 0x4322), (kernel_ulong_t)&hptiop_itl_ops },
> +	{ PCI_VDEVICE(TTI, 0x4210), (kernel_ulong_t)&hptiop_itl_ops },
> +	{ PCI_VDEVICE(TTI, 0x4211), (kernel_ulong_t)&hptiop_itl_ops },
> +	{ PCI_VDEVICE(TTI, 0x4310), (kernel_ulong_t)&hptiop_itl_ops },
> +	{ PCI_VDEVICE(TTI, 0x4311), (kernel_ulong_t)&hptiop_itl_ops },
>  	{ PCI_VDEVICE(TTI, 0x3120), (kernel_ulong_t)&hptiop_mv_ops },
>  	{ PCI_VDEVICE(TTI, 0x3122), (kernel_ulong_t)&hptiop_mv_ops },
>  	{ PCI_VDEVICE(TTI, 0x3020), (kernel_ulong_t)&hptiop_mv_ops },

I assume that this patch makes new devices work, whereas they do not
work correctly in unpatched kernels, yes?

If so, then this patch should be backported into 2.6.25.x and 2.6.26.x.
Users of these kernels would presumably like their devices to work.

  reply	other threads:[~2008-07-29  7:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-07-25  5:29 [PATCH][SCSI] hptiop: add more PCI device IDs HighPoint Linux Team
2008-07-29  7:34 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2008-07-29  7:52   ` HighPoint Linux Team
2008-07-31 16:50     ` [stable] " Greg KH
2008-07-31 20:06       ` Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080729003419.1b754608.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@highpoint-tech.com \
    --cc=stable@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox