From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Wilcox Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 11185] New: Device/host RESET in SCSI Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 01:21:59 -0600 Message-ID: <20080731072159.GB30534@parisc-linux.org> References: <20080730232409.81965504.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from palinux.external.hp.com ([192.25.206.14]:56850 "EHLO mail.parisc-linux.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753319AbYGaHWA (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jul 2008 03:22:00 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080730232409.81965504.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Andrew Morton Cc: cijoml@volny.cz, bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 11:24:09PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > Why do you describe this regression as a powerpc problem rather than a > scsi one? > > (It could be either or both, I'm just wondering...) This seems quite astute of the reporter. The error messages from sym2 are consistent with an interrupt routing problem. I have an idea for reporting this more effectively (because this comes up every 3-6 months or so) but testing that patch will have to wait until I'm back home. -- Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step."