Hi Andrew,
I ha=
ve tryed
without load the nvidia module. The problem is the same.
I have =
attached
to this e-mail dmesg output, after some seconds which I have connected =
usb card
reader, and output of lsmod. I hope you find this useful. Attach my .co=
nfig
too. Probably is not useful, however you are the expert ...
I not pu=
t
everything static, but I put static only things which are always in use=
and
connected to my desktop. Some things which I use only sometime, i.e. ca=
rd
reader, then compile it as module. I never use firewire at alI, t=
hen I
never compile it. I use this method from ago on the notebook too and al=
ways
work well.
Excuse me for my bad English.
Best
Regards
--- Lun 11/8/08, Andrew Morton
<akpm@linux-foundation.org> ha scritto:
Da: Andrew Morton
<akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Oggetto: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 1130=
2] New:
I get a kernel OOPS! If I try to attach an usb card reader, SD, MMC, ec=
c.. to
my Slamd64
A: "Pierre Ossman" <drzeus@drzeus.cx>
Cc:
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org, pinc_o@ya=
hoo.it,
"James Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Data=
:
Luned=C3=AC 11 agosto 2008, 08:33
On Mon, 11 Aug 2008 07:45=
:53 +0200
Pierre Ossman <drzeus@drzeus.cx> wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Au=
g 2008
13:53:44 -0700
> Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
wrote:
>
> >
> > (switched to email. Please =
respond
via emailed reply-to-all, not via
the
> > bugzilla web
interface).
> >
> > On Sun, 10 Aug 2008 13:45:49 -07=
00
(PDT)
bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote:
> >
> =
>
>
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D11302
> > > <=
br>>
> > Summary: I get a kernel OOPS! If I try to attach a=
n
usb
card
> > > reader, SD, MMC, ecc.. to my
Slamd64
> > > Product: IO/Storage
> > &=
gt; =20
Version: 2.5
> > > KernelVersion: 2.6.26.2
&g=
t; >
> Platform: All
> > > OS/Version:
Linux
> > > Tree: Mainline
> > > =
=20
Status: NEW
> > > Severity: blocking
> &=
gt; >
Priority: P1
> > > Component: SCSI
&g=
t; >
> AssignedTo: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
> > > =
=20
ReportedBy: pinc_o@yahoo.it
> >
> > Is this a scsi
regresion, or an mmc regression?
> >
OK. There have b=
een some
regressions in the scsi area but I
thought
that a) they were fixed and b) none manifested as an oops
in
slave_alloc().
Perhaps James can take a look please?
>
There are no USB based "real" MMC controllers, so I'd say
SCSI.
&=
gt;
> > > If attach my usb card reader, without load mmc_block=
an
mmc_core
modules, then
> > > the follow OOPS appear(If f=
irst
load them, simply doesn't
mount the SD. Please
> > > not=
e: I
always use "automatic loading kernel modules"
compiled in "my"
kernelS.
> > > But from many time, the recent kernelS not l=
oad the
mmc_block
module):
>
> I don't know what kind of weird =
ass
scripts loaded them for USB mass
> storage to begin with. As for =
the
claimed lack of crashes when loaded;
> no idea as there is no int=
eraction
between the SCSI and MMC layer.
>
> > > Modules link=
ed in:
nvidia(P) [last unloaded: nvidia]
>
> This is always
a good start..
I very much doubt it.
Paolo, can you plea=
se check
to see if the crash happens in a kernel
into which the nvidia driver=
has
never been loaded?
|