From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?utf-8?B?SsO2cm4=?= Engel Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/18 ver2] libosd: OSDv1 Headers Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 16:17:33 +0100 Message-ID: <20081110151733.GB16520@logfs.org> References: <491073BB.4000900@panasas.com> <1225817046-5946-1-git-send-email-bharrosh@panasas.com> <4916F934.4090205@panasas.com> <20081109174509.GB5350@logfs.org> <4917F50B.3000905@panasas.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from lazybastard.de ([212.112.238.170]:59999 "EHLO longford.logfs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751149AbYKJPSV (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Nov 2008 10:18:21 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4917F50B.3000905@panasas.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Boaz Harrosh Cc: James Bottomley , Andrew Morton , open-osd development , Mike Christie , FUJITA Tomonori , Jeff Garzik , linux-scsi , Sami.Iren@seagate.com, linux-kernel On Mon, 10 November 2008 10:47:07 +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote: >=20 > If the assembly - size and offsets - of foo is exactly the same with = or > without the __packed, but the generated code is different then clearl= y this > is a compiler bug. I've herd of this myth before, and at least with m= y > gcc 4.1.2 there is no such bug. Either the structure gets packed, or = there is > no difference. All the places I have __packed in the code are absolut= ely must > be so, stated by the protocol. Ok, if current compilers are fine, I won't complain. J=C3=B6rn --=20 There's nothing better for promoting creativity in a medium than making an audience feel "Hmm =C2=AD I could do better than that!" -- Douglas Adams in a slashdot interview -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html