public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: move SCSI timeout check into block
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 09:06:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081217080613.GC32491@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1229464844.3193.49.camel@localhost.localdomain>

On Tue, Dec 16 2008, James Bottomley wrote:
> We can eliminate the SCSI command timed out check entirely if the block
> layer does this for us.  The way to do this in block is to check how
> long the request has been outstanding if a requeue is requested and
> ending it if we've gone over retries * timeout.
> 
> This will also eliminate many cases in SCSI where we evade the command
> timeout for various reasons (like initial success converted to requeue)
> 
> James
> 
> ---
> 
> diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
> index c36aa98..d32af31 100644
> --- a/block/blk-core.c
> +++ b/block/blk-core.c
> @@ -926,6 +926,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_start_queueing);
>   */
>  void blk_requeue_request(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq)
>  {
> +	unsigned long wait_for = (rq->retries + 1) * rq->timeout;
> +
>  	blk_delete_timer(rq);
>  	blk_clear_rq_complete(rq);
>  	blk_add_trace_rq(q, rq, BLK_TA_REQUEUE);
> @@ -933,7 +935,17 @@ void blk_requeue_request(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq)
>  	if (blk_rq_tagged(rq))
>  		blk_queue_end_tag(q, rq);
>  
> -	elv_requeue_request(q, rq);
> +	if (time_before(rq->start_time + wait_for, jiffies)) {

I prefer time_after(), reads better.

> +		int bytes = (rq->hard_nr_sectors << 9);
> +
> +		printk(KERN_ERR "%s: timing out command, waited %lus\n",
> +		       rq->rq_disk ? rq->rq_disk->disk_name : "?",
> +		       wait_for/HZ);
> +		if (blk_pc_request(rq))
> +			bytes = rq->data_len;
> +		blk_end_request(rq, -EIO, bytes);

You can just do

                blk_end_request(rq, -EIO, blk_rq_bytes(rq));

and get rid of the 'bytes' variable and type check.

> +	} else
> +		elv_requeue_request(q, rq);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_requeue_request);

But I agree with the patch. Will you rediff, or shall I just apply with
the suggest changes?

-- 
Jens Axboe


  reply	other threads:[~2008-12-17  8:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-12-16 22:00 [PATCH] block: move SCSI timeout check into block James Bottomley
2008-12-17  8:06 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2008-12-17 16:06   ` James Bottomley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20081217080613.GC32491@kernel.dk \
    --to=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox