From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
To: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
Cc: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
open-osd mailing-list <osd-dev@open-osd.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bsg: Fix sense buffer bug in SG_IO
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 14:09:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090120130941.GI30821@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4975CC4F.40006@panasas.com>
On Tue, Jan 20 2009, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>
> When submitting requests via SG_IO, which does a sync io, a
> bsg_command is not allocated, so an in-Kernel sense_buffer was not
> set. However when calling blk_execute_rq() with no sense buffer
> one is provided from the stack. Now bsg at blk_complete_sgv4_hdr_rq()
> would check if rq->sense_len and a sense was requested by sg_io_v4
> the rq->sense was copy_user() back, but by now it is already mangled
> stack memory.
>
> I have fixed that by forcing a sense_buffer when calling bsg_map_hdr().
> The bsg_command->sense is provided in the write/read path like before,
> and on-the-stack buffer is provided when doing SG_IO.
>
> I have also fixed a dprintk message to print rq->errors in hex because
> of the scsi bit-field use of this member. For other block devices it
> does not matter anyway.
>
> Signed-off-by: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
Acked-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
> ---
> block/bsg.c | 17 ++++++++++-------
> 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/bsg.c b/block/bsg.c
> index d414bb5..0ce8806 100644
> --- a/block/bsg.c
> +++ b/block/bsg.c
> @@ -244,7 +244,8 @@ bsg_validate_sgv4_hdr(struct request_queue *q, struct sg_io_v4 *hdr, int *rw)
> * map sg_io_v4 to a request.
> */
> static struct request *
> -bsg_map_hdr(struct bsg_device *bd, struct sg_io_v4 *hdr, fmode_t has_write_perm)
> +bsg_map_hdr(struct bsg_device *bd, struct sg_io_v4 *hdr, fmode_t has_write_perm,
> + u8 *sense)
> {
> struct request_queue *q = bd->queue;
> struct request *rq, *next_rq = NULL;
> @@ -306,6 +307,10 @@ bsg_map_hdr(struct bsg_device *bd, struct sg_io_v4 *hdr, fmode_t has_write_perm)
> if (ret)
> goto out;
> }
> +
> + rq->sense = sense;
> + rq->sense_len = 0;
> +
> return rq;
> out:
> if (rq->cmd != rq->__cmd)
> @@ -348,9 +353,6 @@ static void bsg_rq_end_io(struct request *rq, int uptodate)
> static void bsg_add_command(struct bsg_device *bd, struct request_queue *q,
> struct bsg_command *bc, struct request *rq)
> {
> - rq->sense = bc->sense;
> - rq->sense_len = 0;
> -
> /*
> * add bc command to busy queue and submit rq for io
> */
> @@ -419,7 +421,7 @@ static int blk_complete_sgv4_hdr_rq(struct request *rq, struct sg_io_v4 *hdr,
> {
> int ret = 0;
>
> - dprintk("rq %p bio %p %u\n", rq, bio, rq->errors);
> + dprintk("rq %p bio %p 0x%x\n", rq, bio, rq->errors);
> /*
> * fill in all the output members
> */
> @@ -635,7 +637,7 @@ static int __bsg_write(struct bsg_device *bd, const char __user *buf,
> /*
> * get a request, fill in the blanks, and add to request queue
> */
> - rq = bsg_map_hdr(bd, &bc->hdr, has_write_perm);
> + rq = bsg_map_hdr(bd, &bc->hdr, has_write_perm, bc->sense);
> if (IS_ERR(rq)) {
> ret = PTR_ERR(rq);
> rq = NULL;
> @@ -922,11 +924,12 @@ static long bsg_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
> struct request *rq;
> struct bio *bio, *bidi_bio = NULL;
> struct sg_io_v4 hdr;
> + u8 sense[SCSI_SENSE_BUFFERSIZE];
>
> if (copy_from_user(&hdr, uarg, sizeof(hdr)))
> return -EFAULT;
>
> - rq = bsg_map_hdr(bd, &hdr, file->f_mode & FMODE_WRITE);
> + rq = bsg_map_hdr(bd, &hdr, file->f_mode & FMODE_WRITE, sense);
> if (IS_ERR(rq))
> return PTR_ERR(rq);
>
> --
> 1.6.0.1
>
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-20 13:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-20 13:06 [PATCH] bsg: Fix sense buffer bug in SG_IO Boaz Harrosh
2009-01-20 13:09 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2009-01-29 11:36 ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-01-20 23:10 ` FUJITA Tomonori
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090120130941.GI30821@kernel.dk \
--to=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=bharrosh@panasas.com \
--cc=fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=osd-dev@open-osd.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox