From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
To: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: bharrosh@panasas.com, dougg@torque.net,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, osd-dev@open-osd.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bsg: Add support for submitting requests at tail of queue
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 12:13:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090122111302.GG30821@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090122082314G.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
On Thu, Jan 22 2009, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 11:52:39 +0200
> Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > Currently inherited from sg.c bsg will submit asynchronous request
> > at the head-of-the-queue, (using "at_head" set in the call to
> > blk_execute_rq_nowait()). This is bad in situation where we want
> > to keep the queues full but need the requests to execute in order.
>
> As I wrote, I think that blk_execute_rq_nowait inserts a request and
> plugs a queue. So how can you keep the queue full? On the completion
> of blk_execute_rq_nowait, the queue is empty.
That's not true at all. If you submit more than one request, request 2
and up would be queued according to the orientation given. It may even
include request 1 as well, what if the queue is busy doing work for
someone else already?
I think the patch makes sense, I also wish that the default would have
been reversed so that at_back would be the default. at_back is more
complex though, since it impacts existing requests for the device (it
drains the scheduler queue).
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-22 11:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-21 9:52 [PATCH] bsg: Add support for submitting requests at tail of queue Boaz Harrosh
2009-01-21 23:24 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-01-22 8:57 ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-01-22 11:13 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2009-01-22 12:44 ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-01-22 12:46 ` Jens Axboe
2009-01-22 22:03 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-01-22 22:27 ` James Bottomley
2009-01-23 6:14 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-01-25 9:17 ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-01-25 9:41 ` [PATCH version2] " Boaz Harrosh
2009-01-25 9:44 ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-01-25 10:07 ` [PATCH version 3] " Boaz Harrosh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090122111302.GG30821@kernel.dk \
--to=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=bharrosh@panasas.com \
--cc=dougg@torque.net \
--cc=fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=osd-dev@open-osd.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox