From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: [stable] [PATCH -stable 2.6.28.x] sg: avoid blk_put_request/blk_rq_unmap_user in interrupt Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 22:05:58 -0800 Message-ID: <20090211060558.GB31483@kroah.com> References: <20090211145014C.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from kroah.org ([198.145.64.141]:36586 "EHLO coco.kroah.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750975AbZBKGIE (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Feb 2009 01:08:04 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090211145014C.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: FUJITA Tomonori Cc: stable@kernel.org, rjw@sisk.pl, hias@horus.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com, dgilbert@interlog.com On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 02:50:18PM +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > This patch is against 2.6.28.x, fixes a regression from 2.6.27. > > This is the modified version of the following patch that is planed to > merged into 2.6.30-rc1 in scsi-misc tree: > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/jejb/scsi-misc-2.6.git;a=commit;h=b35fe25ae156830f85a305afaba837b084458e7a > > scsi-misc tree has other patches to fix sg oops so the above patch > can't be cleanly applied to 2.6.28.x. These patches are too large for > 2.6.28.x (needs more testings) so sg in 2.6.28.x still has the oops > bugs for now even with this patch. I expect that these patches will go > into stable trees too after 2.6.30-rc1 (that is, after more people > test them). What about 2.6.29? If it still has this problem as well, why not get this patch into that tree now? Then it can go into the -stable trees. As it is, I can't take a patch in the .28.y or .27.y trees that is not in Linus's tree. confused, greg k-h