public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: "Rengarajan, Narayanan (STSD)" <narayanan.rengarajan@hp.com>,
	"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] : Spinning up disk is observed on standby paths until timeout, resulting in longer path restoration time.
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:52:21 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090220155221.GU16841@parisc-linux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1235144182.3349.5.camel@localhost.localdomain>

On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 03:36:22PM +0000, James Bottomley wrote:
> > +                   sshdr.asc == 4 && (sshdr.ascq == 3 || sshdr.ascq == 0x0b ||
> > sshdr.ascq == 0x0c) ) {
> > +                       break;  /* manual intervention required || Standby ||
> 
> This really doesn't look right ASC/ASCQ 0x04/0x0b is LUN not accessible;
> target *port* in standby state. That's supposed to be because it was put
> into a standby state according to SPC3(r23) 5.8.2.4.4
> 
> I don't see how a port (target) is expected to come out of standby with
> a LUN command.  The standard implies you need to do it with a set target
> port groups command.  What array is actually giving this?

The port isn't coming out of standby state.  We send it a TEST_UNIT_READY,
it replies with a 0x04/0x0b.  At that point, we currently decide to send
it a START_STOP and wait 100 seconds.  This is clearly a crappy decision
on our part, we should just bail.

-- 
Matthew Wilcox				Intel Open Source Technology Centre
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours.  We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."

  reply	other threads:[~2009-02-20 15:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-02-20 11:14 [PATCH 1/1] : Spinning up disk is observed on standby paths until timeout, resulting in longer path restoration time Rengarajan, Narayanan (STSD)
2009-02-20 15:36 ` James Bottomley
2009-02-20 15:52   ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2009-02-20 16:03     ` James Bottomley
2009-02-20 16:13       ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-02-20 16:24         ` James Bottomley
2009-02-20 17:04           ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-02-23 11:48             ` Rengarajan, Narayanan (STSD)
2009-02-23 14:52               ` James Bottomley
2009-02-28 21:26                 ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-02-28 23:56                   ` James Bottomley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090220155221.GU16841@parisc-linux.org \
    --to=matthew@wil.cx \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=narayanan.rengarajan@hp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox