From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Wilcox Subject: Re: [PATCH] sd: Try READ CAPACITY 16 first for all SCSI-3 devices Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 15:31:11 -0700 Message-ID: <20090225223110.GY16891@parisc-linux.org> References: <20081223164703.GB19967@parisc-linux.org> <20081231135014.GE2002@parisc-linux.org> <20081231135142.GF2002@parisc-linux.org> <20090223215137.GA13649@parisc-linux.org> <1235600621.19035.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from palinux.external.hp.com ([192.25.206.14]:41915 "EHLO mail.parisc-linux.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752132AbZBYWbN (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Feb 2009 17:31:13 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1235600621.19035.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: James Bottomley Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 02:23:41PM -0800, James Bottomley wrote: > On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 14:51 -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > Any reason this patch hasn't been merged into scsi-misc yet? > > There was a problem with it I drew your attention to here: > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=123308499405071 This was the updated version, sent on Dec 31, not the version you commented on on Dec 23. (I didn't notice your earlier request because I was on vacation when you sent it). -- Matthew Wilcox Intel Open Source Technology Centre "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step."