From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
To: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>,
James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RFC: Transport identifier
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 21:50:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090228045014.GP16891@parisc-linux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <yq1eixjdws0.fsf@sermon.lab.mkp.net>
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 11:13:03PM -0500, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> The following patch below sits somewhere between my original take and
> your patch. Those transports that have classes implemented fill out the
> id like you did. The ones that don't (ATA, FireWire and USB) set it
> manually. Best of both worlds, IMHO.
You seem to have missed the patch to scsi_transport_spi.c.
There's also a lot of parallel SCSI drivers that don't use
scsi_transport_spi.c yet. I'm OK with them being 'unknown' and
eventually people patching them (or perhaps better, converting them to
use scsi_transport_spi!), but thought it was worth mentioning.
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
> diff --git a/drivers/firewire/fw-sbp2.c b/drivers/firewire/fw-sbp2.c
> diff --git a/drivers/ieee1394/sbp2.c b/drivers/ieee1394/sbp2.c
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_iscsi.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_iscsi.c
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_sas.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_sas.c
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_srp.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_srp.c
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/storage/usb.c b/drivers/usb/storage/usb.c
> diff --git a/include/scsi/scsi.h b/include/scsi/scsi.h
> diff --git a/include/scsi/scsi_host.h b/include/scsi/scsi_host.h
--
Matthew Wilcox Intel Open Source Technology Centre
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-28 4:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-26 4:31 RFC: Transport identifier Martin K. Petersen
2009-02-26 4:54 ` Julian Calaby
2009-02-26 5:32 ` Joel Becker
2009-02-26 20:22 ` Martin K. Petersen
2009-02-26 9:53 ` Douglas Gilbert
2009-02-26 15:39 ` Mike Christie
2009-02-26 15:48 ` James Bottomley
2009-02-26 20:32 ` Martin K. Petersen
2009-02-27 7:33 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-02-28 4:13 ` Martin K. Petersen
2009-02-28 4:50 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2009-02-28 5:19 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-02-28 15:40 ` Martin K. Petersen
2009-02-28 14:53 ` Stefan Richter
2009-02-28 15:06 ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-02-28 15:19 ` Stefan Richter
2009-02-28 15:36 ` James Bottomley
2009-02-28 15:54 ` Martin K. Petersen
2009-02-28 15:42 ` Martin K. Petersen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090228045014.GP16891@parisc-linux.org \
--to=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox