From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
To: Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>
Cc: Grant Grundler <grundler@google.com>,
FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>,
mike.miller@hp.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
hare@novell.com, iss_storagedev@hp.com, iss.sbteam@hp.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hpsa: SCSI driver for HP Smart Array controllers
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 19:36:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090302183649.GB11787@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49AC237A.7060005@cs.wisc.edu>
On Mon, Mar 02 2009, Mike Christie wrote:
> Grant Grundler wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 10:32 PM, FUJITA Tomonori
>> <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>> ...
>>>> +/*
>>>> + * For operations that cannot sleep, a command block is allocated at init,
>>>> + * and managed by cmd_alloc() and cmd_free() using a simple bitmap to track
>>>> + * which ones are free or in use. Lock must be held when calling this.
>>>> + * cmd_free() is the complement.
>>>> + */
>>>> +static struct CommandList_struct *cmd_alloc(struct ctlr_info *h)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct CommandList_struct *c;
>>>> + int i;
>>>> + union u64bit temp64;
>>>> + dma_addr_t cmd_dma_handle, err_dma_handle;
>>>> +
>>>> + do {
>>>> + i = find_first_zero_bit(h->cmd_pool_bits, h->nr_cmds);
>>>> + if (i == h->nr_cmds)
>>>> + return NULL;
>>>> + } while (test_and_set_bit
>>>> + (i & (BITS_PER_LONG - 1),
>>>> + h->cmd_pool_bits + (i / BITS_PER_LONG)) != 0);
>>> Using bitmap to manage free commands looks too complicated a bit to
>>> me. Can we just use lists for command management?
>>
>> Bit maps are generally more efficient than lists since we touch less data.
>> For both search and moving elements from free<->busy lists. This probably
>> won't matter if we are talking less than 10K IOPS. And willy demonstrated
>> other layers have pretty high overhead (block, libata and SCSI midlayer)
>> at high transaction rates.
>>
>
> If it was just needing this for the queuecommand path it would be
> simple. For the queuecommand path we could just use the scsi host
> tagging code for the index. You do not need a lock in the queuecommand
> path for getting a index and command, and you do not need to duplicate
> the tag/index allocation code in the block/scsi code
>
> A problem with the host tagging is what to do if you need a tag/index
> for a internal command. In the slow path like the device reset and cache
> flush case you could use a list or preallocated command or whatever
> other drivers are using that makes you happy.
>
> Or for the reset/shutdown/internal path could we come up with a
> extension to the existing API. Maybe just add some wrapper around some
> of blk_queue_start_tag that takes a the bqt (the bqt would come from the
> host wide one) and allocates the tag (need a something similar for the
> release side).
This is precisely what I did for libata, here is is interleaved with
some other stuff:
http://git.kernel.dk/?p=linux-2.6-block.git;a=commitdiff;h=f557570ec6042370333b6b9c33bbbae175120a89
It needs a little more polish and so on, but the concept is identical to
what you describe for this case. And I agree, it's much better to use
the same index instead of generating/maintaining seperate bitmaps for
this type of thing.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-02 18:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-27 23:09 [PATCH] hpsa: SCSI driver for HP Smart Array controllers Mike Miller
2009-03-01 13:49 ` Rolf Eike Beer
2009-03-02 6:32 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-03-02 17:19 ` Grant Grundler
2009-03-02 18:20 ` Mike Christie
2009-03-02 18:36 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2009-03-02 20:33 ` Mike Christie
2009-03-02 20:37 ` Mike Christie
2009-03-03 9:43 ` Jens Axboe
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-03-02 14:56 scameron
2009-03-03 6:35 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-03-03 16:28 ` scameron
2009-03-05 5:48 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-03-05 14:21 ` scameron
2009-03-05 16:54 ` Andrew Patterson
2009-03-06 8:55 ` Jens Axboe
2009-03-06 9:13 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-03-06 9:21 ` Jens Axboe
2009-03-06 9:27 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-03-06 9:35 ` Jens Axboe
2009-03-06 14:38 ` scameron
2009-03-06 19:06 ` Jens Axboe
2009-03-06 20:59 ` Grant Grundler
2009-03-06 21:18 ` scameron
2009-03-06 21:55 ` Grant Grundler
2009-03-06 21:59 ` James Bottomley
2009-03-05 14:55 ` Miller, Mike (OS Dev)
2009-03-03 16:49 ` Mike Christie
2009-03-03 21:28 ` scameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090302183649.GB11787@kernel.dk \
--to=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=grundler@google.com \
--cc=hare@novell.com \
--cc=iss.sbteam@hp.com \
--cc=iss_storagedev@hp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michaelc@cs.wisc.edu \
--cc=mike.miller@hp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox