From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Natalie Protasevich <protasnb@gmail.com>,
Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org>,
Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux PM List <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Linux SCSI List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.29-rc6: Reported regressions from 2.6.28
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 14:45:13 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090303194513.GA10548@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090303193609.GE27178@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 08:36:10PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Unresolved regressions
> > ----------------------
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12551
> > Subject : end_request: I/O error, dev cciss/c0d0, sector 87435720
> > Submitter : Ralf Hildebrandt <ralf.hildebrandt@charite.de>
> > Date : 2009-01-27 06:51 (28 days old)
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12497
> > Subject : new barrier warnings in 2.6.29-rc1
> > Submitter : Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> > Date : 2009-01-12 15:46 (43 days old)
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123177528217154&w=4
> > Handled-By : Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
> I've just noticed that the above two reports are probably the same bug...
> Just that we don't duplicate the effort.
At least on the XFS side it's fixed now. The block layer gets the
initial detection right without warning, and a patch to fix the
unconditional cache flush on unmount is on it's way.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-03 19:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-23 21:45 2.6.29-rc6: Reported regressions from 2.6.28 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-24 7:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-25 23:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-03 19:36 ` Jan Kara
2009-03-03 19:45 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2009-03-03 19:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090303194513.GA10548@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bunk@kernel.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=protasnb@gmail.com \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox