From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: Large amount of scsi-sgpool objects Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 12:12:35 +0100 Message-ID: <20090304111235.GA14593@elte.hu> References: <1236115544.15993.22.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20090303214454.GA8288@elte.hu> <1236119990.24019.35.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20090303230323.GA21644@elte.hu> <49ADBE29.4040706@s5r6.in-berlin.de> <20090303234834.GA13389@elte.hu> <49AE221D.9010909@s5r6.in-berlin.de> <1236150752.6049.19.camel@marge.simson.net> <49AE32B5.9040603@s5r6.in-berlin.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:46780 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750991AbZCDLNG (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Mar 2009 06:13:06 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Stefan Richter , Mike Galbraith , James Bottomley , Jan Engelhardt , Boaz Harrosh , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton * Thomas Gleixner wrote: > Stefan, > > On Wed, 4 Mar 2009, Stefan Richter wrote: > > As I said, I recommend that people do not receive those off-topic > > patches by default, only on demand. (Because I sometimes work with -rt > > users.) > > And as I said before, I missed to remove the patch before pushing out > the -rt tree. So I really do not need repeated advise on how to do my > work. yeah. I dont think Stefan ever maintained a high-volume generic tree before. Kibitzing from the sidelines always makes it seem so easy ;-) Ingo