linux-scsi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
	Zach Brown <zach.brown@oracle.com>,
	Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>,
	linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: LSF Papers online?
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 16:47:42 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200904141647.43049.bzolnier@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49E40362.1070405@kernel.org>

On Tuesday 14 April 2009 05:30:42 Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Bartlomiej.
> 
> Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > I've started reading it and immediately noticed a thing which made by day. :-)
> > 
> > Sorry if it will sound off-topic or undiplomatic but it is the best occasion
> > to straighten up some facts:
> > 
> >  "Discussion then moved on to the current status of getting libata out of
> >   SCSI: we have had several successes, notably timer handling and pieces of
> >   error handling have moved up to block. Unfortunately, the current progress
> >   has reached the point where it's being impeded by the legacy IDE subsystem
> > 
> > Heh, you can also blame the lack of world peace on the legacy IDE subsystem.
> > 
> > I wonder who came up with this ridiculous excuse (I'm sure it wasn't James!).
> 
> Eh... It was my session.  It probably is a bit too summarized.  I
> wans't really trying to blame IDE.  The point was that, at this point,
> adding any feature to the block layer is pretty precarious because in
> many places block layer API has become somewhat ambiguous and many
> users have been abusing in interesting ways for quite some time.  IDE,
> due to its history and complexity, happens to be the most complex one
> to clean up, so that was why IDE was mentioned in the session.
> 
> It's not like IDE has been preventing libata separation for all those
> years.  It's more like, when finally I got my lazy ass moving about
> moving features from SCSI midlayer to block layer, I realized I better
> clean up block API before moving forward and IDE was the most
> difficult user of block API in the process.

Right, this is the proper way of doing it.

> I apologize if it sounded like an attack on IDE.  It's true that IDE
> is the biggest block API abuser but it's mostly due to its long
> history and inherent complexity and you have been doing a lot to clean
> it up, so let's get it done.

No worries, lets focus on cleaning this up.

Thanks,
Bart

  reply	other threads:[~2009-04-14 14:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-13 12:53 LSF Papers online? Boaz Harrosh
2009-04-13 13:58 ` James Bottomley
2009-04-13 14:42   ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-04-13 14:51     ` James Bottomley
2009-04-13 15:19     ` Chris Mason
2009-04-13 15:44       ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-04-13 16:45         ` Theodore Tso
2009-04-13 18:11     ` Jonathan Corbet
2009-04-13 20:05       ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2009-04-13 21:40       ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-04-13 21:49         ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-04-13 22:24         ` Jeff Garzik
2009-04-14  1:24           ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-04-14 10:14             ` Jeff Garzik
2009-04-14 14:54               ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-04-14 15:40                 ` Jeff Garzik
2009-04-14 16:54                 ` Alan Cox
2009-04-14 22:09                   ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-04-14 22:49                     ` James Bottomley
2009-04-15  1:39                       ` Robert Hancock
2009-04-15  3:58                         ` James Bottomley
2009-04-15  8:30                           ` Alan Cox
2009-04-16  6:31                         ` Grant Grundler
2009-04-16 16:37                           ` James Bottomley
2009-04-16 17:45                             ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-04-14 23:14                     ` Jeff Garzik
2009-04-15  9:28                     ` Alan Cox
2009-04-15 13:38                       ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-04-15 14:56                         ` Alan Cox
2009-04-16 16:01                           ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-04-14  3:30         ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-14 14:47           ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [this message]
2009-04-16 21:36 ` Grant Grundler
2009-04-17  4:44   ` Martin K. Petersen
2009-04-18  4:06     ` Grant Grundler
2009-04-19 11:00   ` Boaz Harrosh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200904141647.43049.bzolnier@gmail.com \
    --to=bzolnier@gmail.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=bharrosh@panasas.com \
    --cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=zach.brown@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).