From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Wilcox Subject: Re: SCSI Driver Regression and Missing Code Block? Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:09:28 -0600 Message-ID: <20090422020928.GD1926@parisc-linux.org> References: <30274704.7281240360796458.JavaMail.root@mail.paragon.co.nz> <5313655.7301240361406269.JavaMail.root@mail.paragon.co.nz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from palinux.external.hp.com ([192.25.206.14]:39851 "EHLO mail.parisc-linux.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751260AbZDVCJa (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Apr 2009 22:09:30 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5313655.7301240361406269.JavaMail.root@mail.paragon.co.nz> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Dominic Driver Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:50:06PM +1200, Dominic Driver wrote: > Hi Guys, > > I had an interesting experience with my SATA DVD-RW Drives following a Kernel Upgrade from: > > 2.6.27.19-170.2.35.fc10.i686 > to > 2.6.28.6 (Vanilla) One of the problems with trying to diagnose the problem is that you're going from a distro kernel to a vanilla kernel. So it's not necessarily something we've taken out -- it could be something they've put in and we don't know about. So it'd be really nice to see if 2.6.27 vanilla behaves like 2.6.28 vanilla or like 2.6.27-fc. You might also want to try 2.6.29 as Fedora do backport patches from later kernels. -- Matthew Wilcox Intel Open Source Technology Centre "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step."