linux-scsi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jeff@garzik.org,
	linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	bzolnier@gmail.com, petkovbb@googlemail.com,
	sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com, mike.miller@hp.com,
	chirag.kantharia@hp.com, Eric.Moore@lsi.com,
	stern@rowland.harvard.edu, fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp,
	zaitcev@redhat.com, Geert.Uytterhoeven@sonycom.com,
	sfr@canb.auug.org.au, grant.likely@secretlab.ca,
	paul.clements@steeleye.com, jesper.juhl@gmail.com,
	tim@cyberelk.net, jeremy@xensource.com, adrian@mcmen.demon.co.uk,
	oakad@yahoo.com, dwmw2@infradead.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com,
	ballabio_dario@emc.com, davem@davemloft.net,
	rusty@rustcorp.com.au, Markus.Lidel@shadowconnect.com,
	"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/10] block: cleanup rq->data_len usages
Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 20:27:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090501182758.GC4593@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1241105757.3320.1.camel@mulgrave.int.hansenpartnership.com>

On Thu, Apr 30 2009, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-04-30 at 16:47 +0300, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> > > @@ -966,7 +965,7 @@ static int scsi_init_sgtable(struct request
> > *req, struct scsi_data_buffer *sdb,
> > >       BUG_ON(count > sdb->table.nents);
> > >       sdb->table.nents = count;
> > >       if (blk_pc_request(req))
> > > -             sdb->length = req->data_len;
> > > +             sdb->length = blk_rq_bytes(req);
> > >       else
> > >               sdb->length = blk_rq_sectors(req) << 9;
> > 
> > Is this true. I thought they must be the same now. I was actually
> > anticipating this if() removed.
> 
> Me too ... there's one of these in scsi_lib.c as well.
> 
> The difference comes because filesystem requests are always in sectors,
> but BLOCK_PC requests are always in bytes .... we should be able to wrap
> the accessors so they do the correct conversions.

blk_rq_bytes() already takes care of this, it can be used on any type
request. So just kill the if/else.

-- 
Jens Axboe


  reply	other threads:[~2009-05-01 18:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-29  9:13 [GIT PATCH] block,scsi,ide: unify sector and data_len Tejun Heo
2009-04-29  9:13 ` [PATCH 01/10] nbd: don't clear rq->sector and nr_sectors unnecessarily Tejun Heo
2009-04-29  9:13 ` [PATCH 02/10] ide-tape: don't initialize rq->sector for rw requests Tejun Heo
2009-04-30  6:14   ` Borislav Petkov
2009-04-29  9:13 ` [PATCH 03/10] block: add rq->resid_len Tejun Heo
2009-04-29 14:41   ` James Bottomley
2009-04-30  1:59     ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-30  6:45       ` Borislav Petkov
2009-04-30  7:19         ` Tejun Heo
     [not found]         ` <49F95101.3010004@kernel.org>
2009-04-30  7:37           ` Borislav Petkov
2009-04-30  9:25             ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-29  9:13 ` [PATCH 04/10] block: implement blk_rq_pos/[cur_]sectors() and convert obvious ones Tejun Heo
2009-04-29  9:25   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2009-04-29 10:16     ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-29 14:18   ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-04-29 14:49   ` Grant Likely
2009-04-29  9:13 ` [PATCH 05/10] block: convert to pos and nr_sectors accessors Tejun Heo
2009-04-29  9:40   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2009-04-29 10:19     ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-29 14:48   ` Grant Likely
     [not found]   ` <1241037446.4516.2.camel@localhost.localdomain>
2009-04-30 17:30     ` Adrian McMenamin
2009-04-29  9:13 ` [PATCH 06/10] ide: convert to rq " Tejun Heo
2009-04-29  9:13 ` [PATCH 07/10] block: drop request->hard_* and *nr_sectors Tejun Heo
2009-04-30 13:46   ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-05-04  5:06     ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-29  9:13 ` [PATCH 08/10] block: cleanup rq->data_len usages Tejun Heo
2009-04-30 13:47   ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-04-30 15:35     ` James Bottomley
2009-05-01 18:27       ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2009-05-03  1:32       ` Tejun Heo
2009-05-03 13:51         ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-05-04  4:19           ` Tejun Heo
2009-05-03  1:36     ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-29  9:13 ` [PATCH 09/10] ide: " Tejun Heo
2009-04-29  9:13 ` [PATCH 10/10] block: hide request sector and data_len Tejun Heo
2009-04-30 16:07 ` [GIT PATCH] block,scsi,ide: unify " Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-05-01 18:29 ` Jens Axboe
2009-05-03  2:50   ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090501182758.GC4593@kernel.dk \
    --to=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=Eric.Moore@lsi.com \
    --cc=Geert.Uytterhoeven@sonycom.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --cc=Markus.Lidel@shadowconnect.com \
    --cc=adrian@mcmen.demon.co.uk \
    --cc=ballabio_dario@emc.com \
    --cc=bharrosh@panasas.com \
    --cc=bzolnier@gmail.com \
    --cc=chirag.kantharia@hp.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=djwong@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp \
    --cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
    --cc=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=jeremy@xensource.com \
    --cc=jesper.juhl@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mike.miller@hp.com \
    --cc=oakad@yahoo.com \
    --cc=paul.clements@steeleye.com \
    --cc=petkovbb@googlemail.com \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    --cc=tim@cyberelk.net \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=zaitcev@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).