From: Mike Anderson <andmike@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>
Cc: SCSI Mailing List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] blk_abort_queue on failed paths?
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 00:56:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090605075654.GA3758@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A280DDF.7070205@cs.wisc.edu>
Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu> wrote:
> Mike Christie wrote:
>> adding linux-scsi and Mike Anderson
>>
>> David Strand wrote:
>>> After updating to kernel 2.6.28 I found that when I performed some
>>> cable break testing during device i/o, I would get unwanted device or
>>> host resets. Ultimately I traced it back to this patch:
>>>
>>> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-2.6.29.y.git;a=commit;h=224cb3e981f1b2f9f93dbd49eaef505d17d894c2
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The call to blk_abort_queue causes the block layer to call
>>> scsi_times_out for pending i/o, which can (or will) ultimately lead to
>>> device, and/or bus and/or host resets, which of course cause all the
>>> other devices significant disruption.
>>>
>>
>> What driver were you using?
>
> Oh yeah, I do not think this should happen in new kernels if the driver
> is failing the IO with DID_TRANSPORT_DISRUPTED when it is deleting the
> rport. That should cause the IO to requeue and wait for fast io fail to
> fire.
>
> Maybe we just need to convert some more drivers?
Yes, I am seeing this in my test runs using a DS4K storage device and the
RDAC device handler.
"Jun 5 00:39:58 elm3c244 kernel: [ 873.180267] sd 1:0:0:1: [sdd] Result:
hostbyte=DID_TRANSPORT_DISRUPTED driverbyte=DRIVER_OK"
-andmike
--
Michael Anderson
andmike@linux.vnet.ibm.com
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-05 7:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <448b15030906021555j4e476193kcf69e019992dc592@mail.gmail.com>
2009-06-03 21:39 ` blk_abort_queue on failed paths? Mike Christie
2009-06-04 17:18 ` [dm-devel] " Mike Anderson
2009-06-04 17:56 ` Mike Christie
2009-06-04 18:02 ` [dm-devel] " Mike Christie
2009-06-05 8:28 ` Mike Anderson
2009-06-04 18:09 ` Mike Christie
2009-06-04 20:35 ` [dm-devel] " David Strand
2009-06-05 7:56 ` Mike Anderson [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090605075654.GA3758@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=andmike@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox