From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Wilcox Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi_wait_scan: no option appears when configuring for scsi_wait_scan. Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 20:12:54 -0600 Message-ID: <20090617021254.GQ19977@parisc-linux.org> References: <4A384FE4.9090703@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from palinux.external.hp.com ([192.25.206.14]:48494 "EHLO mail.parisc-linux.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751699AbZFQCMw (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Jun 2009 22:12:52 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4A384FE4.9090703@gmail.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Changli Gao Cc: James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com, Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 10:07:32AM +0800, Changli Gao wrote: > FIXBUG: missing comment after tristate leads to no option for > scsci_wait_scan when configuring. Please search the archives. Patches along these lines have been rejected before. -- Matthew Wilcox Intel Open Source Technology Centre "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step."