Re: [PATCH] Add BLIST_REPORTLUN2 to EMC SYMMETRIX

Re: [PATCH] Add BLIST_REPORTLUN2 to EMC SYMMETRIX

[James Bottomley]

On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 20:18 +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> From: Kurt Garloff <garloff@suse.de>
> 
> All EMC SYMMETRIX support REPORT_LUNS, even if configured to report
> SCSI-2 for whatever reason.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kurt Garloff <garloff@suse.de>
> Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
> Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
> ---
> We have this fix in our SLES10 kernel for over a year now, I guess
> it's about time to get it upstream so that everyone benefits.
> 
> Patch already sent on:
>  * 2009-05-29

The SCSI mailing list doesn't find it.

>  drivers/scsi/scsi_devinfo.c |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> --- root.orig/drivers/scsi/scsi_devinfo.c
> +++ root/drivers/scsi/scsi_devinfo.c
> @@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ static struct {
>  	{"DGC", "RAID", NULL, BLIST_SPARSELUN},	/* Dell PV 650F, storage on LUN 0 */
>  	{"DGC", "DISK", NULL, BLIST_SPARSELUN},	/* Dell PV 650F, no storage on LUN 0 */
>  	{"EMC",  "Invista", "*", BLIST_SPARSELUN | BLIST_LARGELUN},
> -	{"EMC", "SYMMETRIX", NULL, BLIST_SPARSELUN | BLIST_LARGELUN | BLIST_FORCELUN},
> +	{"EMC", "SYMMETRIX", NULL, BLIST_SPARSELUN | BLIST_LARGELUN | BLIST_REPORTLUN2},

You don't actually need SPARSE or LARGELUN ... that's implied by
REPORTLUN2, so only REPORTLUN2 is needed here.

>  	{"EMULEX", "MD21/S2     ESDI", NULL, BLIST_SINGLELUN},
>  	{"easyRAID", "16P", NULL, BLIST_NOREPORTLUN},
>  	{"easyRAID", "X6P", NULL, BLIST_NOREPORTLUN},

James

Re: [PATCH] Add BLIST_REPORTLUN2 to EMC SYMMETRIX

[Kurt Garloff]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1786 bytes --]

James,

On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 07:33:32PM +0000, James Bottomley wrote:
> > --- root.orig/drivers/scsi/scsi_devinfo.c
> > +++ root/drivers/scsi/scsi_devinfo.c
> > @@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ static struct {
> >  	{"DGC", "RAID", NULL, BLIST_SPARSELUN},	/* Dell PV 650F, storage on LUN 0 */
> >  	{"DGC", "DISK", NULL, BLIST_SPARSELUN},	/* Dell PV 650F, no storage on LUN 0 */
> >  	{"EMC",  "Invista", "*", BLIST_SPARSELUN | BLIST_LARGELUN},
> > -	{"EMC", "SYMMETRIX", NULL, BLIST_SPARSELUN | BLIST_LARGELUN | BLIST_FORCELUN},
> > +	{"EMC", "SYMMETRIX", NULL, BLIST_SPARSELUN | BLIST_LARGELUN | BLIST_REPORTLUN2},
> 
> You don't actually need SPARSE or LARGELUN ... that's implied by
> REPORTLUN2, so only REPORTLUN2 is needed here.

When I created the patch, all SYMMETRIXes that I had ever been exposed
to did support REPORT_LUNs, but I was not sure that every single 
SYMMETRIX out there would actually support it. So in case some old
SYMMETRIX would not and the kernel would fall back to sequential
scanning, we would still find all LUNs by not dropping SPARSELUN
and LARGELUN. (Dropping FORCELUN on the other hand was absolutely right;
the flag is broken by design anyway and should never be used.)

So leaving in SPARSELUN and LARGELUN was not an oversight, but really
trying to be conservative.

If you have additional insight (you positively know that every SYMMETRIX
does support REPORT_LUNS) or you want to force possible devices that
do not support it into the open by breaking them, then remove the two
flags.

> >  	{"EMULEX", "MD21/S2     ESDI", NULL, BLIST_SINGLELUN},
> >  	{"easyRAID", "16P", NULL, BLIST_NOREPORTLUN},
> >  	{"easyRAID", "X6P", NULL, BLIST_NOREPORTLUN},

Best,
-- 
Kurt Garloff, VP OPS Partner Engineering -- Novell Inc.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH] Add BLIST_REPORTLUN2 to EMC SYMMETRIX

[Jean Delvare]

Le mercredi 01 juillet 2009, James Bottomley a écrit :
> On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 20:18 +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > From: Kurt Garloff <garloff@suse.de>
> > 
> > All EMC SYMMETRIX support REPORT_LUNS, even if configured to report
> > SCSI-2 for whatever reason.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Kurt Garloff <garloff@suse.de>
> > Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
> > Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
> > ---
> > We have this fix in our SLES10 kernel for over a year now, I guess
> > it's about time to get it upstream so that everyone benefits.
> > 
> > Patch already sent on:
> >  * 2009-05-29
> 
> The SCSI mailing list doesn't find it.

Indeed. Very strange, as my mailer is positive it did send it. Must
have been lost on the road... sorry.

-- 
Jean Delvare
Suse L3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

RE: [PATCH] Add BLIST_REPORTLUN2 to EMC SYMMETRIX

[berthiaume_wayne]

There are still very old Symmetrix arrays out there that could be broken
if we drop BLIST_SPARSELUN or BLIST_LARGELUN because they don't support
REPORT_LUNS.

Regards,
Wayne.  

-----Original Message-----
From: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org
[mailto:linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Kurt Garloff
Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2009 3:42 PM
To: James Bottomley
Cc: Jean Delvare; linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org; Hannes Reinecke
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add BLIST_REPORTLUN2 to EMC SYMMETRIX

James,

On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 07:33:32PM +0000, James Bottomley wrote:
> > --- root.orig/drivers/scsi/scsi_devinfo.c
> > +++ root/drivers/scsi/scsi_devinfo.c
> > @@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ static struct {
> >  	{"DGC", "RAID", NULL, BLIST_SPARSELUN},	/* Dell PV 650F, storage
on LUN 0 */
> >  	{"DGC", "DISK", NULL, BLIST_SPARSELUN},	/* Dell PV 650F, no
storage on LUN 0 */
> >  	{"EMC",  "Invista", "*", BLIST_SPARSELUN | BLIST_LARGELUN},
> > -	{"EMC", "SYMMETRIX", NULL, BLIST_SPARSELUN | BLIST_LARGELUN |
BLIST_FORCELUN},
> > +	{"EMC", "SYMMETRIX", NULL, BLIST_SPARSELUN | BLIST_LARGELUN |
BLIST_REPORTLUN2},
> 
> You don't actually need SPARSE or LARGELUN ... that's implied by
> REPORTLUN2, so only REPORTLUN2 is needed here.

When I created the patch, all SYMMETRIXes that I had ever been exposed
to did support REPORT_LUNs, but I was not sure that every single 
SYMMETRIX out there would actually support it. So in case some old
SYMMETRIX would not and the kernel would fall back to sequential
scanning, we would still find all LUNs by not dropping SPARSELUN
and LARGELUN. (Dropping FORCELUN on the other hand was absolutely right;
the flag is broken by design anyway and should never be used.)

So leaving in SPARSELUN and LARGELUN was not an oversight, but really
trying to be conservative.

If you have additional insight (you positively know that every SYMMETRIX
does support REPORT_LUNS) or you want to force possible devices that
do not support it into the open by breaking them, then remove the two
flags.

> >  	{"EMULEX", "MD21/S2     ESDI", NULL, BLIST_SINGLELUN},
> >  	{"easyRAID", "16P", NULL, BLIST_NOREPORTLUN},
> >  	{"easyRAID", "X6P", NULL, BLIST_NOREPORTLUN},

Best,
-- 
Kurt Garloff, VP OPS Partner Engineering -- Novell Inc.

RE: [PATCH] Add BLIST_REPORTLUN2 to EMC SYMMETRIX

[James Bottomley]

On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 10:38 -0400, berthiaume_wayne@emc.com wrote:
> There are still very old Symmetrix arrays out there that could be broken
> if we drop BLIST_SPARSELUN or BLIST_LARGELUN because they don't support
> REPORT_LUNS.

OK, as long as all the older arrays correctly return ILLEGAL REQUEST to
a REPORT LUNS command, we'll be fine.

James