From: Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
To: James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Chris Leech <christopher.leech@intel.com>,
Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 21/35] libfc: combine name server registration response handlers
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 16:58:47 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090911235847.27223.88067.stgit@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090911235655.27223.69728.stgit@localhost.localdomain>
From: Chris Leech <christopher.leech@intel.com>
They all do the same thing, so combine them into a single function.
Signed-off-by: Chris Leech <christopher.leech@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
---
drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_lport.c | 205 ++++++-----------------------------------
1 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 175 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_lport.c b/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_lport.c
index 76197d7..5e7b560 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_lport.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_lport.c
@@ -985,9 +985,9 @@ static void fc_lport_error(struct fc_lport *lport, struct fc_frame *fp)
}
/**
- * fc_lport_rft_id_resp() - Handle response to Register Fibre
- * Channel Types by ID (RFT_ID) request
- * @sp: current sequence in RFT_ID exchange
+ * fc_lport_ns_resp() - Handle response to a name server
+ * registration exchange
+ * @sp: current sequence in exchange
* @fp: response frame
* @lp_arg: Fibre Channel host port instance
*
@@ -995,130 +995,23 @@ static void fc_lport_error(struct fc_lport *lport, struct fc_frame *fp)
* held, but it will lock, call an _enter_* function or fc_lport_error
* and then unlock the lport.
*/
-static void fc_lport_rft_id_resp(struct fc_seq *sp, struct fc_frame *fp,
- void *lp_arg)
+static void fc_lport_ns_resp(struct fc_seq *sp, struct fc_frame *fp,
+ void *lp_arg)
{
struct fc_lport *lport = lp_arg;
struct fc_frame_header *fh;
struct fc_ct_hdr *ct;
- FC_LPORT_DBG(lport, "Received a RFT_ID %s\n", fc_els_resp_type(fp));
+ FC_LPORT_DBG(lport, "Received a ns %s\n", fc_els_resp_type(fp));
if (fp == ERR_PTR(-FC_EX_CLOSED))
return;
mutex_lock(&lport->lp_mutex);
- if (lport->state != LPORT_ST_RFT_ID) {
- FC_LPORT_DBG(lport, "Received a RFT_ID response, but in state "
- "%s\n", fc_lport_state(lport));
- if (IS_ERR(fp))
- goto err;
- goto out;
- }
-
- if (IS_ERR(fp)) {
- fc_lport_error(lport, fp);
- goto err;
- }
-
- fh = fc_frame_header_get(fp);
- ct = fc_frame_payload_get(fp, sizeof(*ct));
-
- if (fh && ct && fh->fh_type == FC_TYPE_CT &&
- ct->ct_fs_type == FC_FST_DIR &&
- ct->ct_fs_subtype == FC_NS_SUBTYPE &&
- ntohs(ct->ct_cmd) == FC_FS_ACC)
- fc_lport_enter_scr(lport);
- else
- fc_lport_error(lport, fp);
-out:
- fc_frame_free(fp);
-err:
- mutex_unlock(&lport->lp_mutex);
-}
-
-/**
- * fc_lport_rspn_id_resp() - Handle response to Register Symbolic Port Name
- * by ID (RSPN_ID) request
- * @sp: current sequence in RSPN_ID exchange
- * @fp: response frame
- * @lp_arg: Fibre Channel host port instance
- *
- * Locking Note: This function will be called without the lport lock
- * held, but it will lock, call an _enter_* function or fc_lport_error
- * and then unlock the lport.
- */
-static void fc_lport_rspn_id_resp(struct fc_seq *sp, struct fc_frame *fp,
- void *lp_arg)
-{
- struct fc_lport *lport = lp_arg;
- struct fc_frame_header *fh;
- struct fc_ct_hdr *ct;
-
- FC_LPORT_DBG(lport, "Received a RSPN_ID %s\n", fc_els_resp_type(fp));
-
- if (fp == ERR_PTR(-FC_EX_CLOSED))
- return;
-
- mutex_lock(&lport->lp_mutex);
-
- if (lport->state != LPORT_ST_RSPN_ID) {
- FC_LPORT_DBG(lport, "Received a RSPN_ID response, but in state "
- "%s\n", fc_lport_state(lport));
- if (IS_ERR(fp))
- goto err;
- goto out;
- }
-
- if (IS_ERR(fp)) {
- fc_lport_error(lport, fp);
- goto err;
- }
-
- fh = fc_frame_header_get(fp);
- ct = fc_frame_payload_get(fp, sizeof(*ct));
- if (fh && ct && fh->fh_type == FC_TYPE_CT &&
- ct->ct_fs_type == FC_FST_DIR &&
- ct->ct_fs_subtype == FC_NS_SUBTYPE &&
- ntohs(ct->ct_cmd) == FC_FS_ACC)
- fc_lport_enter_rspn_id(lport);
- else
- fc_lport_error(lport, fp);
-
-out:
- fc_frame_free(fp);
-err:
- mutex_unlock(&lport->lp_mutex);
-}
-/**
- * fc_lport_rsnn_nn_resp() - Handle response to Register Symbolic Node Name
- * by Node Name (RSNN_NN) request
- * @sp: current sequence in RSNN_NN exchange
- * @fp: response frame
- * @lp_arg: Fibre Channel host port instance
- *
- * Locking Note: This function will be called without the lport lock
- * held, but it will lock, call an _enter_* function or fc_lport_error
- * and then unlock the lport.
- */
-static void fc_lport_rsnn_nn_resp(struct fc_seq *sp, struct fc_frame *fp,
- void *lp_arg)
-{
- struct fc_lport *lport = lp_arg;
- struct fc_frame_header *fh;
- struct fc_ct_hdr *ct;
-
- FC_LPORT_DBG(lport, "Received a RSNN_NN %s\n", fc_els_resp_type(fp));
-
- if (fp == ERR_PTR(-FC_EX_CLOSED))
- return;
-
- mutex_lock(&lport->lp_mutex);
-
- if (lport->state != LPORT_ST_RSNN_NN) {
- FC_LPORT_DBG(lport, "Received a RSNN_NN response, but in state "
- "%s\n", fc_lport_state(lport));
+ if (lport->state < LPORT_ST_RNN_ID || lport->state > LPORT_ST_RFT_ID) {
+ FC_LPORT_DBG(lport, "Received a name server response, "
+ "but in state %s\n", fc_lport_state(lport));
if (IS_ERR(fp))
goto err;
goto out;
@@ -1131,68 +1024,30 @@ static void fc_lport_rsnn_nn_resp(struct fc_seq *sp, struct fc_frame *fp,
fh = fc_frame_header_get(fp);
ct = fc_frame_payload_get(fp, sizeof(*ct));
- if (fh && ct && fh->fh_type == FC_TYPE_CT &&
- ct->ct_fs_type == FC_FST_DIR &&
- ct->ct_fs_subtype == FC_NS_SUBTYPE &&
- ntohs(ct->ct_cmd) == FC_FS_ACC)
- fc_lport_enter_rsnn_nn(lport);
- else
- fc_lport_error(lport, fp);
-
-out:
- fc_frame_free(fp);
-err:
- mutex_unlock(&lport->lp_mutex);
-}
-/**
- * fc_lport_rnn_id_resp() - Handle response to Register Node
- * Name by ID (RNN_ID) request
- * @sp: current sequence in RNN_ID exchange
- * @fp: response frame
- * @lp_arg: Fibre Channel host port instance
- *
- * Locking Note: This function will be called without the lport lock
- * held, but it will lock, call an _enter_* function or fc_lport_error
- * and then unlock the lport.
- */
-static void fc_lport_rnn_id_resp(struct fc_seq *sp, struct fc_frame *fp,
- void *lp_arg)
-{
- struct fc_lport *lport = lp_arg;
- struct fc_frame_header *fh;
- struct fc_ct_hdr *ct;
-
- FC_LPORT_DBG(lport, "Received a RNN_ID %s\n", fc_els_resp_type(fp));
-
- if (fp == ERR_PTR(-FC_EX_CLOSED))
- return;
-
- mutex_lock(&lport->lp_mutex);
-
- if (lport->state != LPORT_ST_RNN_ID) {
- FC_LPORT_DBG(lport, "Received a RNN_ID response, but in state "
- "%s\n", fc_lport_state(lport));
- if (IS_ERR(fp))
- goto err;
- goto out;
- }
-
- if (IS_ERR(fp)) {
- fc_lport_error(lport, fp);
- goto err;
- }
-
- fh = fc_frame_header_get(fp);
- ct = fc_frame_payload_get(fp, sizeof(*ct));
if (fh && ct && fh->fh_type == FC_TYPE_CT &&
ct->ct_fs_type == FC_FST_DIR &&
ct->ct_fs_subtype == FC_NS_SUBTYPE &&
ntohs(ct->ct_cmd) == FC_FS_ACC)
- fc_lport_enter_rft_id(lport);
+ switch (lport->state) {
+ case LPORT_ST_RNN_ID:
+ fc_lport_enter_rsnn_nn(lport);
+ break;
+ case LPORT_ST_RSNN_NN:
+ fc_lport_enter_rspn_id(lport);
+ break;
+ case LPORT_ST_RSPN_ID:
+ fc_lport_enter_rft_id(lport);
+ break;
+ case LPORT_ST_RFT_ID:
+ fc_lport_enter_scr(lport);
+ break;
+ default:
+ /* should have already been caught by state checks */
+ break;
+ }
else
fc_lport_error(lport, fp);
-
out:
fc_frame_free(fp);
err:
@@ -1311,7 +1166,7 @@ static void fc_lport_enter_rft_id(struct fc_lport *lport)
}
if (!lport->tt.elsct_send(lport, FC_FID_DIR_SERV, fp, FC_NS_RFT_ID,
- fc_lport_rft_id_resp,
+ fc_lport_ns_resp,
lport, lport->e_d_tov))
fc_lport_error(lport, fp);
}
@@ -1342,7 +1197,7 @@ static void fc_lport_enter_rspn_id(struct fc_lport *lport)
}
if (!lport->tt.elsct_send(lport, FC_FID_DIR_SERV, fp, FC_NS_RSPN_ID,
- fc_lport_rspn_id_resp,
+ fc_lport_ns_resp,
lport, lport->e_d_tov))
fc_lport_error(lport, fp);
}
@@ -1373,7 +1228,7 @@ static void fc_lport_enter_rsnn_nn(struct fc_lport *lport)
}
if (!lport->tt.elsct_send(lport, FC_FID_DIR_SERV, fp, FC_NS_RSNN_NN,
- fc_lport_rsnn_nn_resp,
+ fc_lport_ns_resp,
lport, lport->e_d_tov))
fc_lport_error(lport, fp);
}
@@ -1402,7 +1257,7 @@ static void fc_lport_enter_rnn_id(struct fc_lport *lport)
}
if (!lport->tt.elsct_send(lport, FC_FID_DIR_SERV, fp, FC_NS_RNN_ID,
- fc_lport_rnn_id_resp,
+ fc_lport_ns_resp,
lport, lport->e_d_tov))
fc_lport_error(lport, fp);
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-11 23:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-11 23:56 [PATCH 00/35] libfc, libfcoe and fcoe updates for 2.6.32 Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:57 ` [PATCH 01/35] libfc: fix typo in retry check on received PRLI Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:57 ` [PATCH 02/35] fcoe: Increase FCOE_MAX_LUN to 0xFFFF (65535) Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:57 ` [PATCH 03/35] libfc: Move non-common routines and prototypes out of libfc.h Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:57 ` [PATCH 04/35] libfc: Remove fc_fcp_complete Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:57 ` [PATCH 05/35] libfc: Add libfc/fc_libfc.[ch] for libfc internal routines Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:57 ` [PATCH 06/35] libfc: Move libfc_init and libfc_exit to fc_libfc.c Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:57 ` [PATCH 07/35] libfc: fix ddp in fc_fcp for 0 xid Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:57 ` [PATCH 08/35] fcoe: remove redundant checking of netdev->netdev_ops Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:57 ` [PATCH 09/35] libfc, fcoe: fixes for highmem skb linearize panics Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:57 ` [PATCH 10/35] libfc: changes to libfc_host_alloc to consolidate initialization with allocation Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:57 ` [PATCH 11/35] libfc: add some generic NPIV support routines to libfc Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:57 ` [PATCH 12/35] libfc: vport link handling and fc_vport state managment Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:58 ` [PATCH 13/35] libfc, libfcoe: FDISC ELS for NPIV Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:58 ` [PATCH 14/35] libfcoe, fcoe: libfcoe NPIV support Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:58 ` [PATCH 15/35] fcoe: add a separate scsi transport template for NPIV vports Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:58 ` [PATCH 16/35] fcoe: NPIV vport create/destroy Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:58 ` [PATCH 17/35] libfc: RPN_ID is obsolete and unnecessary Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:58 ` [PATCH 18/35] libfc: RNN_ID may be required before RSNN_NN with some switches Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:58 ` [PATCH 19/35] libfc: Register Symbolic Node Name (RSNN_NN) Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:58 ` [PATCH 20/35] libfc: Register Symbolic Port Name (RSPN_ID) Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:58 ` Robert Love [this message]
2009-09-11 23:58 ` [PATCH 22/35] libfc: combine name server registration request functions Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:58 ` [PATCH 23/35] fcoe: vport symbolic name support Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:59 ` [PATCH 24/35] libfc: Export FC headers Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:59 ` [PATCH 25/35] libfc: Add routine to copy data from a buffer to a SG list Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:59 ` [PATCH 26/35] libfc, fcoe: Add FC passthrough support Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:59 ` [PATCH 27/35] libfc, fcoe: Don't EXPORT_SYMBOLS unnecessarily Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:59 ` [PATCH 28/35] libfc: Remove unused fc_lport pointer from fc_fcp_pkt_abort Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:59 ` [PATCH 29/35] libfc: Formatting cleanups across libfc Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:59 ` [PATCH 30/35] libfcoe: formatting and comment cleanups Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:59 ` [PATCH 31/35] fcoe: Formatting cleanups and commenting Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:59 ` [PATCH 32/35] libfc: Fix wrong scsi return status under FC_DATA_UNDRUN Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:59 ` [PATCH 33/35] fcoe, libfc: use single frame allocation API Robert Love
2009-09-12 0:00 ` [PATCH 34/35] libfc: reduce can_queue for all FCP frame allocation failures Robert Love
2009-09-12 0:00 ` [PATCH 35/35] libfc: adds can_queue ramp up Robert Love
2009-09-14 17:18 ` Mike Christie
2009-09-14 23:23 ` Vasu Dev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090911235847.27223.88067.stgit@localhost.localdomain \
--to=robert.w.love@intel.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=christopher.leech@intel.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox