public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
To: James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Chris Leech <christopher.leech@intel.com>,
	Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 21/35] libfc: combine name server registration response handlers
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 16:58:47 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090911235847.27223.88067.stgit@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090911235655.27223.69728.stgit@localhost.localdomain>

From: Chris Leech <christopher.leech@intel.com>

They all do the same thing, so combine them into a single function.

Signed-off-by: Chris Leech <christopher.leech@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
---

 drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_lport.c |  205 ++++++-----------------------------------
 1 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 175 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_lport.c b/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_lport.c
index 76197d7..5e7b560 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_lport.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_lport.c
@@ -985,9 +985,9 @@ static void fc_lport_error(struct fc_lport *lport, struct fc_frame *fp)
 }
 
 /**
- * fc_lport_rft_id_resp() - Handle response to Register Fibre
- *			    Channel Types by ID (RFT_ID) request
- * @sp: current sequence in RFT_ID exchange
+ * fc_lport_ns_resp() - Handle response to a name server
+ * 			registration exchange
+ * @sp: current sequence in exchange
  * @fp: response frame
  * @lp_arg: Fibre Channel host port instance
  *
@@ -995,130 +995,23 @@ static void fc_lport_error(struct fc_lport *lport, struct fc_frame *fp)
  * held, but it will lock, call an _enter_* function or fc_lport_error
  * and then unlock the lport.
  */
-static void fc_lport_rft_id_resp(struct fc_seq *sp, struct fc_frame *fp,
-				 void *lp_arg)
+static void fc_lport_ns_resp(struct fc_seq *sp, struct fc_frame *fp,
+			     void *lp_arg)
 {
 	struct fc_lport *lport = lp_arg;
 	struct fc_frame_header *fh;
 	struct fc_ct_hdr *ct;
 
-	FC_LPORT_DBG(lport, "Received a RFT_ID %s\n", fc_els_resp_type(fp));
+	FC_LPORT_DBG(lport, "Received a ns %s\n", fc_els_resp_type(fp));
 
 	if (fp == ERR_PTR(-FC_EX_CLOSED))
 		return;
 
 	mutex_lock(&lport->lp_mutex);
 
-	if (lport->state != LPORT_ST_RFT_ID) {
-		FC_LPORT_DBG(lport, "Received a RFT_ID response, but in state "
-			     "%s\n", fc_lport_state(lport));
-		if (IS_ERR(fp))
-			goto err;
-		goto out;
-	}
-
-	if (IS_ERR(fp)) {
-		fc_lport_error(lport, fp);
-		goto err;
-	}
-
-	fh = fc_frame_header_get(fp);
-	ct = fc_frame_payload_get(fp, sizeof(*ct));
-
-	if (fh && ct && fh->fh_type == FC_TYPE_CT &&
-	    ct->ct_fs_type == FC_FST_DIR &&
-	    ct->ct_fs_subtype == FC_NS_SUBTYPE &&
-	    ntohs(ct->ct_cmd) == FC_FS_ACC)
-		fc_lport_enter_scr(lport);
-	else
-		fc_lport_error(lport, fp);
-out:
-	fc_frame_free(fp);
-err:
-	mutex_unlock(&lport->lp_mutex);
-}
-
-/**
- * fc_lport_rspn_id_resp() - Handle response to Register Symbolic Port Name
- *			     by ID (RSPN_ID) request
- * @sp: current sequence in RSPN_ID exchange
- * @fp: response frame
- * @lp_arg: Fibre Channel host port instance
- *
- * Locking Note: This function will be called without the lport lock
- * held, but it will lock, call an _enter_* function or fc_lport_error
- * and then unlock the lport.
- */
-static void fc_lport_rspn_id_resp(struct fc_seq *sp, struct fc_frame *fp,
-				  void *lp_arg)
-{
-	struct fc_lport *lport = lp_arg;
-	struct fc_frame_header *fh;
-	struct fc_ct_hdr *ct;
-
-	FC_LPORT_DBG(lport, "Received a RSPN_ID %s\n", fc_els_resp_type(fp));
-
-	if (fp == ERR_PTR(-FC_EX_CLOSED))
-		return;
-
-	mutex_lock(&lport->lp_mutex);
-
-	if (lport->state != LPORT_ST_RSPN_ID) {
-		FC_LPORT_DBG(lport, "Received a RSPN_ID response, but in state "
-			     "%s\n", fc_lport_state(lport));
-		if (IS_ERR(fp))
-			goto err;
-		goto out;
-	}
-
-	if (IS_ERR(fp)) {
-		fc_lport_error(lport, fp);
-		goto err;
-	}
-
-	fh = fc_frame_header_get(fp);
-	ct = fc_frame_payload_get(fp, sizeof(*ct));
-	if (fh && ct && fh->fh_type == FC_TYPE_CT &&
-	    ct->ct_fs_type == FC_FST_DIR &&
-	    ct->ct_fs_subtype == FC_NS_SUBTYPE &&
-	    ntohs(ct->ct_cmd) == FC_FS_ACC)
-		fc_lport_enter_rspn_id(lport);
-	else
-		fc_lport_error(lport, fp);
-
-out:
-	fc_frame_free(fp);
-err:
-	mutex_unlock(&lport->lp_mutex);
-}
-/**
- * fc_lport_rsnn_nn_resp() - Handle response to Register Symbolic Node Name
- *			     by Node Name (RSNN_NN) request
- * @sp: current sequence in RSNN_NN exchange
- * @fp: response frame
- * @lp_arg: Fibre Channel host port instance
- *
- * Locking Note: This function will be called without the lport lock
- * held, but it will lock, call an _enter_* function or fc_lport_error
- * and then unlock the lport.
- */
-static void fc_lport_rsnn_nn_resp(struct fc_seq *sp, struct fc_frame *fp,
-				  void *lp_arg)
-{
-	struct fc_lport *lport = lp_arg;
-	struct fc_frame_header *fh;
-	struct fc_ct_hdr *ct;
-
-	FC_LPORT_DBG(lport, "Received a RSNN_NN %s\n", fc_els_resp_type(fp));
-
-	if (fp == ERR_PTR(-FC_EX_CLOSED))
-		return;
-
-	mutex_lock(&lport->lp_mutex);
-
-	if (lport->state != LPORT_ST_RSNN_NN) {
-		FC_LPORT_DBG(lport, "Received a RSNN_NN response, but in state "
-			     "%s\n", fc_lport_state(lport));
+	if (lport->state < LPORT_ST_RNN_ID || lport->state > LPORT_ST_RFT_ID) {
+		FC_LPORT_DBG(lport, "Received a name server response, "
+				    "but in state %s\n", fc_lport_state(lport));
 		if (IS_ERR(fp))
 			goto err;
 		goto out;
@@ -1131,68 +1024,30 @@ static void fc_lport_rsnn_nn_resp(struct fc_seq *sp, struct fc_frame *fp,
 
 	fh = fc_frame_header_get(fp);
 	ct = fc_frame_payload_get(fp, sizeof(*ct));
-	if (fh && ct && fh->fh_type == FC_TYPE_CT &&
-	    ct->ct_fs_type == FC_FST_DIR &&
-	    ct->ct_fs_subtype == FC_NS_SUBTYPE &&
-	    ntohs(ct->ct_cmd) == FC_FS_ACC)
-		fc_lport_enter_rsnn_nn(lport);
-	else
-		fc_lport_error(lport, fp);
-
-out:
-	fc_frame_free(fp);
-err:
-	mutex_unlock(&lport->lp_mutex);
-}
 
-/**
- * fc_lport_rnn_id_resp() - Handle response to Register Node
- *			    Name by ID (RNN_ID) request
- * @sp: current sequence in RNN_ID exchange
- * @fp: response frame
- * @lp_arg: Fibre Channel host port instance
- *
- * Locking Note: This function will be called without the lport lock
- * held, but it will lock, call an _enter_* function or fc_lport_error
- * and then unlock the lport.
- */
-static void fc_lport_rnn_id_resp(struct fc_seq *sp, struct fc_frame *fp,
-				 void *lp_arg)
-{
-	struct fc_lport *lport = lp_arg;
-	struct fc_frame_header *fh;
-	struct fc_ct_hdr *ct;
-
-	FC_LPORT_DBG(lport, "Received a RNN_ID %s\n", fc_els_resp_type(fp));
-
-	if (fp == ERR_PTR(-FC_EX_CLOSED))
-		return;
-
-	mutex_lock(&lport->lp_mutex);
-
-	if (lport->state != LPORT_ST_RNN_ID) {
-		FC_LPORT_DBG(lport, "Received a RNN_ID response, but in state "
-			     "%s\n", fc_lport_state(lport));
-		if (IS_ERR(fp))
-			goto err;
-		goto out;
-	}
-
-	if (IS_ERR(fp)) {
-		fc_lport_error(lport, fp);
-		goto err;
-	}
-
-	fh = fc_frame_header_get(fp);
-	ct = fc_frame_payload_get(fp, sizeof(*ct));
 	if (fh && ct && fh->fh_type == FC_TYPE_CT &&
 	    ct->ct_fs_type == FC_FST_DIR &&
 	    ct->ct_fs_subtype == FC_NS_SUBTYPE &&
 	    ntohs(ct->ct_cmd) == FC_FS_ACC)
-		fc_lport_enter_rft_id(lport);
+		switch (lport->state) {
+		case LPORT_ST_RNN_ID:
+			fc_lport_enter_rsnn_nn(lport);
+			break;
+		case LPORT_ST_RSNN_NN:
+			fc_lport_enter_rspn_id(lport);
+			break;
+		case LPORT_ST_RSPN_ID:
+			fc_lport_enter_rft_id(lport);
+			break;
+		case LPORT_ST_RFT_ID:
+			fc_lport_enter_scr(lport);
+			break;
+		default:
+			/* should have already been caught by state checks */
+			break;
+		}
 	else
 		fc_lport_error(lport, fp);
-
 out:
 	fc_frame_free(fp);
 err:
@@ -1311,7 +1166,7 @@ static void fc_lport_enter_rft_id(struct fc_lport *lport)
 	}
 
 	if (!lport->tt.elsct_send(lport, FC_FID_DIR_SERV, fp, FC_NS_RFT_ID,
-				  fc_lport_rft_id_resp,
+				  fc_lport_ns_resp,
 				  lport, lport->e_d_tov))
 		fc_lport_error(lport, fp);
 }
@@ -1342,7 +1197,7 @@ static void fc_lport_enter_rspn_id(struct fc_lport *lport)
 	}
 
 	if (!lport->tt.elsct_send(lport, FC_FID_DIR_SERV, fp, FC_NS_RSPN_ID,
-				  fc_lport_rspn_id_resp,
+				  fc_lport_ns_resp,
 				  lport, lport->e_d_tov))
 		fc_lport_error(lport, fp);
 }
@@ -1373,7 +1228,7 @@ static void fc_lport_enter_rsnn_nn(struct fc_lport *lport)
 	}
 
 	if (!lport->tt.elsct_send(lport, FC_FID_DIR_SERV, fp, FC_NS_RSNN_NN,
-				  fc_lport_rsnn_nn_resp,
+				  fc_lport_ns_resp,
 				  lport, lport->e_d_tov))
 		fc_lport_error(lport, fp);
 }
@@ -1402,7 +1257,7 @@ static void fc_lport_enter_rnn_id(struct fc_lport *lport)
 	}
 
 	if (!lport->tt.elsct_send(lport, FC_FID_DIR_SERV, fp, FC_NS_RNN_ID,
-				  fc_lport_rnn_id_resp,
+				  fc_lport_ns_resp,
 				  lport, lport->e_d_tov))
 		fc_lport_error(lport, fp);
 }


  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-09-11 23:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-09-11 23:56 [PATCH 00/35] libfc, libfcoe and fcoe updates for 2.6.32 Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:57 ` [PATCH 01/35] libfc: fix typo in retry check on received PRLI Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:57 ` [PATCH 02/35] fcoe: Increase FCOE_MAX_LUN to 0xFFFF (65535) Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:57 ` [PATCH 03/35] libfc: Move non-common routines and prototypes out of libfc.h Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:57 ` [PATCH 04/35] libfc: Remove fc_fcp_complete Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:57 ` [PATCH 05/35] libfc: Add libfc/fc_libfc.[ch] for libfc internal routines Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:57 ` [PATCH 06/35] libfc: Move libfc_init and libfc_exit to fc_libfc.c Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:57 ` [PATCH 07/35] libfc: fix ddp in fc_fcp for 0 xid Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:57 ` [PATCH 08/35] fcoe: remove redundant checking of netdev->netdev_ops Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:57 ` [PATCH 09/35] libfc, fcoe: fixes for highmem skb linearize panics Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:57 ` [PATCH 10/35] libfc: changes to libfc_host_alloc to consolidate initialization with allocation Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:57 ` [PATCH 11/35] libfc: add some generic NPIV support routines to libfc Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:57 ` [PATCH 12/35] libfc: vport link handling and fc_vport state managment Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:58 ` [PATCH 13/35] libfc, libfcoe: FDISC ELS for NPIV Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:58 ` [PATCH 14/35] libfcoe, fcoe: libfcoe NPIV support Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:58 ` [PATCH 15/35] fcoe: add a separate scsi transport template for NPIV vports Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:58 ` [PATCH 16/35] fcoe: NPIV vport create/destroy Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:58 ` [PATCH 17/35] libfc: RPN_ID is obsolete and unnecessary Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:58 ` [PATCH 18/35] libfc: RNN_ID may be required before RSNN_NN with some switches Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:58 ` [PATCH 19/35] libfc: Register Symbolic Node Name (RSNN_NN) Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:58 ` [PATCH 20/35] libfc: Register Symbolic Port Name (RSPN_ID) Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:58 ` Robert Love [this message]
2009-09-11 23:58 ` [PATCH 22/35] libfc: combine name server registration request functions Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:58 ` [PATCH 23/35] fcoe: vport symbolic name support Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:59 ` [PATCH 24/35] libfc: Export FC headers Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:59 ` [PATCH 25/35] libfc: Add routine to copy data from a buffer to a SG list Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:59 ` [PATCH 26/35] libfc, fcoe: Add FC passthrough support Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:59 ` [PATCH 27/35] libfc, fcoe: Don't EXPORT_SYMBOLS unnecessarily Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:59 ` [PATCH 28/35] libfc: Remove unused fc_lport pointer from fc_fcp_pkt_abort Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:59 ` [PATCH 29/35] libfc: Formatting cleanups across libfc Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:59 ` [PATCH 30/35] libfcoe: formatting and comment cleanups Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:59 ` [PATCH 31/35] fcoe: Formatting cleanups and commenting Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:59 ` [PATCH 32/35] libfc: Fix wrong scsi return status under FC_DATA_UNDRUN Robert Love
2009-09-11 23:59 ` [PATCH 33/35] fcoe, libfc: use single frame allocation API Robert Love
2009-09-12  0:00 ` [PATCH 34/35] libfc: reduce can_queue for all FCP frame allocation failures Robert Love
2009-09-12  0:00 ` [PATCH 35/35] libfc: adds can_queue ramp up Robert Love
2009-09-14 17:18   ` Mike Christie
2009-09-14 23:23     ` Vasu Dev

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090911235847.27223.88067.stgit@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=robert.w.love@intel.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --cc=christopher.leech@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox