From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arjan van de Ven Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/4] scsi: export and clean up headers Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 12:46:20 +0200 Message-ID: <20090929124620.2c8abc4d@infradead.org> References: <20090929103353.GA11183@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:51264 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753891AbZI2Kpz (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Sep 2009 06:45:55 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20090929103353.GA11183@redhat.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: James Bottomley , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Boaz Harrosh , Sam Ravnborg On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 12:33:53 +0200 "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote: > This implements a minor cleanup of exported scsi headers, > and adds export of headers that are de-facto used by userspace. > The patches are on top of 2.6.32-rc1. > Can these be queued for 2.6.32? > Thanks. > one of the problems I've found is that glibc has its own copy of scsi headers, causing interesting conflicts. Do you know for sure that with these cleanups we can retire the glibc headers? (that would be very welcome) If not, do you know what it would take to get to that point? -- Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre For development, discussion and tips for power savings, visit http://www.lesswatts.org