From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tino Keitel Subject: Re: disk restart failure after suspend Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 22:28:28 +0200 Message-ID: <20091019202828.GA26338@mac.home> References: <4ADCCB0B.6060005@s5r6.in-berlin.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eazy.amigager.de ([213.239.192.238]:46109 "EHLO eazy.amigager.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753985AbZJSU2c (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Oct 2009 16:28:32 -0400 Received: from mac.home (port-212-202-40-61.dynamic.qsc.de [212.202.40.61]) by eazy.amigager.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 234DDC8C10E for ; Mon, 19 Oct 2009 22:28:37 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4ADCCB0B.6060005@s5r6.in-berlin.de> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Stefan Richter Cc: Alan Stern , linux1394-user@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Tejun Heo On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 22:24:43 +0200, Stefan Richter wrote: [...] > > No. All it does is cause an error message to be printed in the system > > log. But it's possible that a failure lower down in the SCSI stack has > > this effect. > > I wonder what this might be. I my case, XFS threw a lot of errors because of an incaccessible device and set the filesystem offline. Regards, Tino