public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christof Schmitt <christof.schmitt@de.ibm.com>
To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: fc_remote_port_delete and returning SCSI commands from LLD
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 17:24:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091021152437.GA19717@schmichrtp.de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091020144027.GA17717@schmichrtp.de.ibm.com>

On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 04:40:27PM +0200, Christof Schmitt wrote:
> If the remote_port status is not BLOCKED, this will trigger the SCSI
> midlayer error handling which cannot do much during the interruption
> to the hardware and will mark the SCSI devices 'offline'. In order to
> prevent this, the rule would be: First call fc_remote_port_delete to
> set the remote port (or in the case of an HBA interruption all remote
> ports) to BLOCKED, and only after this step call scsi_done to pass the
> SCSI commands back to the upper layers.

I just stumbled across a loop that blocks the SCSI error handling
thread:

	spin_lock_irqsave(shost->host_lock, flags);
	while (rport->port_state == FC_PORTSTATE_BLOCKED) {
		spin_unlock_irqrestore(shost->host_lock, flags);
		msleep(1000);
		spin_lock_irqsave(shost->host_lock, flags);
	}
	spin_unlock_irqrestore(shost->host_lock, flags);

This seems to be popular among FC drivers. Is this the preferred way
to synchronize the FC transport class state changes with the SCSI
midlayer error recovery?

Christof

  reply	other threads:[~2009-10-21 15:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-20 14:40 fc_remote_port_delete and returning SCSI commands from LLD Christof Schmitt
2009-10-21 15:24 ` Christof Schmitt [this message]
2009-10-21 16:33   ` James Smart
2009-10-23  7:58     ` Christof Schmitt
2009-10-23 14:50       ` James Smart
2009-10-27 16:59         ` Christof Schmitt
2009-10-27 19:44           ` James Smart
2009-10-21 16:24 ` James Smart
2009-10-23  7:47   ` Christof Schmitt
2009-10-23 14:47     ` James Smart
2009-10-27 21:57       ` Mike Christie
2009-10-21 18:11 ` Mike Christie
2009-10-23  7:13   ` Christof Schmitt
2009-10-27 21:53     ` Mike Christie
2009-10-28 14:27       ` Christof Schmitt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091021152437.GA19717@schmichrtp.de.ibm.com \
    --to=christof.schmitt@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox