From: Christof Schmitt <christof.schmitt@de.ibm.com>
To: Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: fc_remote_port_delete and returning SCSI commands from LLD
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 15:27:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091028142736.GA7642@schmichrtp.de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AE76BEE.20907@cs.wisc.edu>
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 04:53:50PM -0500, Mike Christie wrote:
> Christof Schmitt wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 01:11:15PM -0500, Mike Christie wrote:
>>> Christof Schmitt wrote:
>>>> If the remote_port status is not BLOCKED, this will trigger the SCSI
>>>> midlayer error handling which cannot do much during the interruption
>>>> to the hardware and will mark the SCSI devices 'offline'. In order to
>>>> prevent this, the rule would be: First call fc_remote_port_delete to
>>>> set the remote port (or in the case of an HBA interruption all remote
>>>> ports) to BLOCKED, and only after this step call scsi_done to pass the
>>>> SCSI commands back to the upper layers.
>>>>
>>> One other note when doing this.
>>>
>>> For problems where you are deleting the rport, it is best to use
>>> something like DID_TRANSPORT_DISRUPTED to fail the cmd if you are
>>> failing it right away.
>>
>> "something like DID_TRANSPORT_DISRUPTED" would be any error code that
>> goes through "maybe_retry" in scsi_decide_disposition? I guess moving
>> to DID_TRANSPORT_DISRUPTED is nice for consistency, but DID_ERROR
>> triggers the same code paths as far as i can see.
>
> It could be a little different. See scsi_noretry_cmd. If you used
> DID_ERROR and something set the driver failfast bit then it would be
> fast failed.
Ok. Somehow i missed scsi_noretry_cmd while looking at the SCSI code.
Then it makes sense to report DID_TRANSPORT_DISRUPTED from the zfcp. I
will target the zfcp patch for the next merge window.
Christof
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-28 14:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-20 14:40 fc_remote_port_delete and returning SCSI commands from LLD Christof Schmitt
2009-10-21 15:24 ` Christof Schmitt
2009-10-21 16:33 ` James Smart
2009-10-23 7:58 ` Christof Schmitt
2009-10-23 14:50 ` James Smart
2009-10-27 16:59 ` Christof Schmitt
2009-10-27 19:44 ` James Smart
2009-10-21 16:24 ` James Smart
2009-10-23 7:47 ` Christof Schmitt
2009-10-23 14:47 ` James Smart
2009-10-27 21:57 ` Mike Christie
2009-10-21 18:11 ` Mike Christie
2009-10-23 7:13 ` Christof Schmitt
2009-10-27 21:53 ` Mike Christie
2009-10-28 14:27 ` Christof Schmitt [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091028142736.GA7642@schmichrtp.de.ibm.com \
--to=christof.schmitt@de.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michaelc@cs.wisc.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox