From: scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Cc: James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mikem@beardog.cce.hp.com,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, smcameron@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cciss: fix reporting of scsi status again.
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 09:15:39 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091218151539.GI8515@beardog.cce.hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091218114137.GP4489@kernel.dk>
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 12:41:37PM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 17 2009, Stephen M. Cameron wrote:
> > From: Stephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com>
> >
> > cciss: fix reporting of scsi status again. This reverts an earlier
> > attempt to fix the status byte reporting. The status byte does
> > not need to be shifted << 1. Code like "scp-result |= CHECK_CONDITION << 1"
> > in other drivers works because CHECK_CONDITION is 0x01, not 0x02 --
> > CHECK_CONDITION is pre-shifted to the right 1 bit for some reason.
>
> What's this against? Current -git (2.6.33-rc1) already looks correct.
Oh, hmm. Well, I guess that's good.
I had sent up a patch previously which "fixed" this (botched it).
Maybe my botched patch was recognized as crap and not picked up.
-- steve
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/block/cciss_scsi.c | 2 +-
> > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/block/cciss_scsi.c b/drivers/block/cciss_scsi.c
> > index 75a9ca9..0634ec7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/block/cciss_scsi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/block/cciss_scsi.c
> > @@ -728,7 +728,7 @@ complete_scsi_command( CommandList_struct *cp, int timeout, __u32 tag)
> >
> > cmd->result = (DID_OK << 16); /* host byte */
> > cmd->result |= (COMMAND_COMPLETE << 8); /* msg byte */
> > - cmd->result |= (ei->ScsiStatus << 1);
> > + cmd->result |= ei->ScsiStatus;
> > /* printk("Scsistatus is 0x%02x\n", ei->ScsiStatus); */
> >
> > /* copy the sense data whether we need to or not. */
> >
>
> --
> Jens Axboe
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-18 15:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-17 14:22 [PATCH] cciss: fix reporting of scsi status again Stephen M. Cameron
2009-12-18 11:41 ` Jens Axboe
2009-12-18 15:15 ` scameron [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091218151539.GI8515@beardog.cce.hp.com \
--to=scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mikem@beardog.cce.hp.com \
--cc=smcameron@yahoo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox