From: "Krzysztof Błaszkowski" <kb@sysmikro.com.pl>
To: dgilbert@interlog.com
Cc: eric@andante.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Krzysztof.b@id-7.com
Subject: Re: does scsi_io_completion need to dump sense data for ata pass through (ck_cond = 1) ?
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 00:11:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200912230011.44703.kb@sysmikro.com.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B312181.30000@interlog.com>
On Tuesday 22 December 2009 20:44, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
> Krzysztof Błaszkowski wrote:
> > Hello Eric,
> >
> > I think it is not necessary and current behavior of kernel like 2.6.31
> > confuses QA people.
> > They need explanation that message like below:
> >
> > sd 5:0:1:0: [sdb] Sense Key : Recovered Error [current] [descriptor]
> > Descriptor sense data with sense descriptors (in hex):
> > 72 01 00 1d 00 00 00 0e 09 0c 00 00 00 00 00 00
> > 00 00 00 00 00 50
> > sd 5:0:1:0: [sdb] Add. Sense: ATA pass through information available
> >
> > stands for that sense data contains ata registers file and the command
> > was executed properly.
> >
> > Here is additional condition i used in scsi_io_completion() which
> > suppresses this message. Is it okay ?
>
> Close but I would like to see a filter on the additional
> sense code ATA PASS-THROUGH INFORMATION AVAILABLE [0x0, 0x1d].
> There is nothing in SAT that precludes the return of a RECOVERED
> ERROR sense code for a read on a SATA disk that was recovered
> after some extra work (for example).
of course but is it good idea to log sense data if:
- it is created on demand by application. (sat-2 ch 12.2.2 and .3)
- it doesn't contain some failure status
?
> With that filter in place there is no need to filter on the command.
right but OTOH if filter used asc/ascq then it would filter out all commands
even these with some failures.
i am not sure if this is really what you want to have, ie block all dumps of
ATA PASS-THROUGH sense data.
>
> IOWs just filter on sense code RECOVERED ERROR and additional
> sense code ATA PASS-THROUGH INFORMATION AVAILABLE. SAT and SAT-2
> compliant implementations should then dump less to the log.
i would say that asc/ascq filter will stop logging all SAT/SAT-2 check
conditions instead of "less".
that improvement i sent has better "granularity".
>
> Doug Gilbert
Krzysztof Blaszkowski
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-22 23:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-22 18:17 does scsi_io_completion need to dump sense data for ata pass through (ck_cond = 1) ? Krzysztof Błaszkowski
2009-12-22 19:44 ` Douglas Gilbert
2009-12-22 23:11 ` Krzysztof Błaszkowski [this message]
2009-12-23 5:45 ` Douglas Gilbert
2009-12-23 11:16 ` Krzysztof Błaszkowski
2009-12-27 19:56 ` Eric Youngdale
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200912230011.44703.kb@sysmikro.com.pl \
--to=kb@sysmikro.com.pl \
--cc=Krzysztof.b@id-7.com \
--cc=dgilbert@interlog.com \
--cc=eric@andante.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox