From: Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, james.smart@emulex.com
Cc: giridhar.malavali@qlogic.com
Subject: [RFC PATCH 3/6] fcoe: move link speed checking into its own routine
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:24:32 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100127232432.10343.57051.stgit@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100127232415.10343.86703.stgit@localhost.localdomain>
It doesn't make sense to update the link speed in the is_link_ok()
routine. Move it to it's own routine and acquire the device speed
when we're configuring the device initially as well as if there are
any netdev events received.
Signed-off-by: Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
---
drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c b/drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c
index 10be9f3..a719994 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c
@@ -73,6 +73,7 @@ static int fcoe_rcv(struct sk_buff *, struct net_device *,
static int fcoe_percpu_receive_thread(void *);
static void fcoe_clean_pending_queue(struct fc_lport *);
static void fcoe_percpu_clean(struct fc_lport *);
+static int fcoe_link_speed_update(struct fc_lport *);
static int fcoe_link_ok(struct fc_lport *);
static struct fc_lport *fcoe_hostlist_lookup(const struct net_device *);
@@ -628,6 +629,8 @@ static int fcoe_netdev_config(struct fc_lport *lport, struct net_device *netdev)
port->fcoe_pending_queue_active = 0;
setup_timer(&port->timer, fcoe_queue_timer, (unsigned long)lport);
+ fcoe_link_speed_update(lport);
+
if (!lport->vport) {
/*
* Use NAA 1&2 (FC-FS Rev. 2.0, Sec. 15) to generate WWNN/WWPN:
@@ -1834,6 +1837,9 @@ static int fcoe_device_notification(struct notifier_block *notifier,
FCOE_NETDEV_DBG(netdev, "Unknown event %ld "
"from netdev netlink\n", event);
}
+
+ fcoe_link_speed_update(lport);
+
if (link_possible && !fcoe_link_ok(lport))
fcoe_ctlr_link_up(&fcoe->ctlr);
else if (fcoe_ctlr_link_down(&fcoe->ctlr)) {
@@ -2115,27 +2121,20 @@ out_nodev:
}
/**
- * fcoe_link_ok() - Check if the link is OK for a local port
- * @lport: The local port to check link on
- *
- * Any permanently-disqualifying conditions have been previously checked.
- * This also updates the speed setting, which may change with link for 100/1000.
+ * fcoe_link_speed_update() - Update the supported and actual link speeds
+ * @lport: The local port to update speeds for
*
- * This function should probably be checking for PAUSE support at some point
- * in the future. Currently Per-priority-pause is not determinable using
- * ethtool, so we shouldn't be restrictive until that problem is resolved.
- *
- * Returns: 0 if link is OK for use by FCoE.
+ * Returns: 0 if the ethtool query was successful
+ * -1 if the ethtool query failed
*
*/
-int fcoe_link_ok(struct fc_lport *lport)
+int fcoe_link_speed_update(struct fc_lport *lport)
{
struct fcoe_port *port = lport_priv(lport);
struct net_device *netdev = port->fcoe->netdev;
struct ethtool_cmd ecmd = { ETHTOOL_GSET };
- if ((netdev->flags & IFF_UP) && netif_carrier_ok(netdev) &&
- (!dev_ethtool_get_settings(netdev, &ecmd))) {
+ if (!dev_ethtool_get_settings(netdev, &ecmd)) {
lport->link_supported_speeds &=
~(FC_PORTSPEED_1GBIT | FC_PORTSPEED_10GBIT);
if (ecmd.supported & (SUPPORTED_1000baseT_Half |
@@ -2155,6 +2154,23 @@ int fcoe_link_ok(struct fc_lport *lport)
}
/**
+ * fcoe_link_ok() - Check if the link is OK for a local port
+ * @lport: The local port to check link on
+ *
+ * Returns: 0 if link is UP and OK, -1 if not
+ *
+ */
+int fcoe_link_ok(struct fc_lport *lport)
+{
+ struct fcoe_port *port = lport_priv(lport);
+ struct net_device *netdev = port->fcoe->netdev;
+
+ if ((netdev->flags & IFF_UP) && netif_carrier_ok(netdev))
+ return 0;
+ return -1;
+}
+
+/**
* fcoe_percpu_clean() - Clear all pending skbs for an local port
* @lport: The local port whose skbs are to be cleared
*
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-27 23:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-27 23:24 [RFC PATCH 0/6] Work In Progress: FC sysfs Robert Love
2010-01-27 23:24 ` [RFC PATCH 1/6] libfc: Remove unused fc_get_host_port_type Robert Love
2010-01-27 23:24 ` [RFC PATCH 2/6] libfc: Remove extra pointer check Robert Love
2010-01-27 23:24 ` Robert Love [this message]
2010-01-27 23:24 ` [RFC PATCH 4/6] libfc: Move the port_id into lport Robert Love
2010-01-27 23:24 ` [RFC PATCH 5/6] fc_sysfs: Rearrange the FC transport to create FC sysfs Robert Love
2010-01-27 23:24 ` [RFC PATCH 6/6] libfc, libfcoe, fcoe: Make use of " Robert Love
2010-01-28 16:01 ` [RFC PATCH 0/6] Work In Progress: " Hannes Reinecke
2010-01-29 19:31 ` Robert Love
2010-02-02 13:06 ` Christof Schmitt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100127232432.10343.57051.stgit@localhost.localdomain \
--to=robert.w.love@intel.com \
--cc=giridhar.malavali@qlogic.com \
--cc=james.smart@emulex.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox