public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
To: James.Bottomley@suse.de, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Hugh Daschbach <hdasch@broadcom.com>,
	Joe Eykholt <jeykholt@cisco.com>,
	Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/9] libfc: Fix e_d_tov ns -> ms scaling factor in PLOGI response.
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 12:15:23 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100216201523.26581.60460.stgit@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100216201513.26581.83756.stgit@localhost.localdomain>

From: Hugh Daschbach <hdasch@broadcom.com>

Both PLOGI and RTV response processing conditionally scale e_d_tov,
but use different scaling factors.  The scaling factor is correct in
RTV response processing.  Bring PLOGI e_d_tov scaling in line with RTV
common service parameter inspection.

Signed-off-by: Hugh Daschbach <hdasch@broadcom.com>
Acked-by: Joe Eykholt <jeykholt@cisco.com>
Signed-off-by: Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
---

 drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_rport.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_rport.c b/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_rport.c
index 0230052..97923bb 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_rport.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_rport.c
@@ -623,7 +623,7 @@ static void fc_rport_plogi_resp(struct fc_seq *sp, struct fc_frame *fp,
 
 		tov = ntohl(plp->fl_csp.sp_e_d_tov);
 		if (ntohs(plp->fl_csp.sp_features) & FC_SP_FT_EDTR)
-			tov /= 1000;
+			tov /= 1000000;
 		if (tov > rdata->e_d_tov)
 			rdata->e_d_tov = tov;
 		csp_seq = ntohs(plp->fl_csp.sp_tot_seq);


  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-02-16 20:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-02-16 20:15 [PATCH 0/9] Updates to libfc, libfcoe, fcoe and fnic Robert Love
2010-02-16 20:15 ` [PATCH 1/9] libfc: call ddp setup for only FCP reads to avoid accessing junk fsp pointer Robert Love
2010-02-16 20:15 ` Robert Love [this message]
2010-02-16 20:15 ` [PATCH 3/9] libfc: Don't assume response request present Robert Love
2010-02-16 20:15 ` [PATCH 4/9] libfcoe: Send port LKA every FIP_VN_KA_PERIOD secs Robert Love
2010-02-16 20:15 ` [PATCH 5/9] fcoe: Only rmmod fcoe.ko if there are no active connections Robert Love
2010-02-16 20:15 ` [PATCH 6/9] fnic: Allow multicast and unicast address registrations for fnic Robert Love
2010-02-16 20:15 ` [PATCH 7/9] fnic: lport stats need to be initialized in fnic_probe() Robert Love
2010-02-16 20:15 ` [PATCH 8/9] fnic: Set fnic driver version Robert Love
2010-02-16 20:16 ` [PATCH 9/9] MAINTAINERS: Adding FCoE information to the MAINTAINERS file Robert Love

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100216201523.26581.60460.stgit@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=robert.w.love@intel.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@suse.de \
    --cc=hdasch@broadcom.com \
    --cc=jeykholt@cisco.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox