From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net, error27@gmail.com,
eteo@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [patch 13/27] scsi: remove superfluous NULL pointer check from scsi_kill_request()
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 13:07:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201007211307.15762.bzolnier@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201007202228.o6KMSrU1021751@imap1.linux-foundation.org>
Hi,
This one may be dropped as after almost a year of trying to get it
merged [1] it seems that an added complexity of the patch is not worth
the potential gains (although I can't tell for sure since feedback has
been always 'minimal').
[1] http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0907.3/00416.html
Thanks.
On Wednesday 21 July 2010 12:28:53 am akpm@linux-foundation.org wrote:
> From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
>
> Dan's list included:
>
> drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c +1365 scsi_kill_request(9) warning: variable derefenced in initializer 'cmd'
> drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c +1365 scsi_kill_request(9) warning: variable derefenced before check 'cmd'
>
> We dereference cmd (and possible OOPS if cmd == NULL) before starting the
> request so just remove the superfluous debugging code altogether.
>
> [ bart: the potential NULL pointer dereference was finally fixed in
> (much later than mine) commit 03b1470 but my patch is still valid ]
>
> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
> Cc: Eugene Teo <eteo@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
> Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> ---
>
> drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c | 6 ------
> 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff -puN drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c~scsi-remove-superfluous-null-pointer-check-from-scsi_kill_request drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c~scsi-remove-superfluous-null-pointer-check-from-scsi_kill_request
> +++ a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> @@ -1370,12 +1370,6 @@ static void scsi_kill_request(struct req
>
> blk_start_request(req);
>
> - if (unlikely(cmd == NULL)) {
> - printk(KERN_CRIT "impossible request in %s.\n",
> - __func__);
> - BUG();
> - }
> -
> sdev = cmd->device;
> starget = scsi_target(sdev);
> shost = sdev->host;
> _
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-21 11:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-20 22:28 [patch 13/27] scsi: remove superfluous NULL pointer check from scsi_kill_request() akpm
2010-07-21 11:07 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [this message]
2010-07-21 17:21 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201007211307.15762.bzolnier@gmail.com \
--to=bzolnier@gmail.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=error27@gmail.com \
--cc=eteo@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox